Re: The next Appalachian Regional Commission
- From: "richard" <don@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 09:48:58 -0600
"Pete Jenior" <gtg377a@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:es1hkj$a56$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Well, not quite another ARC, but this proposes a lot of money going to the Mississippi Delta region.
http://www.kentucky.com/mld/kentucky/news/local/states/kentucky/counties/bourbon/16791586.htm
-Pete
After looking at some maps it would appear that over the years that the ARC has expanded the region to nearly 3 times it's original size. For what ever purposes. So hell, why don't we incude San Diego in the region then too? Along with Seattle and Miami.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: The next Appalachian Regional Commission
- From: H . B . Elkins
- Re: The next Appalachian Regional Commission
- From: RJ
- Re: The next Appalachian Regional Commission
- References:
- The next Appalachian Regional Commission
- From: Pete Jenior
- The next Appalachian Regional Commission
- Prev by Date: Re: The next Appalachian Regional Commission
- Next by Date: Re: Why didn't US 71 get a corresponding Interstate route?
- Previous by thread: Re: The next Appalachian Regional Commission
- Next by thread: Re: The next Appalachian Regional Commission
- Index(es):