Re: Why didn't US 71 get a corresponding Interstate route?
- From: "My Land of Misery" <grvan@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 27 Feb 2007 06:30:27 -0800
On Feb 26, 10:40 pm, "Premier Bush" <watuziNOS...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
My Land of Misery wrote:
I dare anyone to drive MO 6 from
Kirksville to Milan sometime. That road will jar any vehicle and is
in serious need of a rebuild. They even patched one bridge of 1950s
vintage with, get this, steel plate! The roads in that part of MO
might be smoother after a terrorist attack or nuke blast.
EB US 50 through Lone Jack is awful. Unless it has been repaved in the last
few years.
I think it was, about 2-3 years ago IIRC
US 36 between Chillicothe and Brookfield is a real mess: extremely
rough pavement, and portions of the eastbound lanes at less than
standard width (still at the 1930s width). MoDOT has it in this
year's project list. Of the entire stretch of the I-72 corridor this
portion would be the most difficult and costly to convert.
.
- References:
- Re: Why didn't US 71 get a corresponding Interstate route?
- From: My Land of Misery
- Re: Why didn't US 71 get a corresponding Interstate route?
- From: Revive755
- Re: Why didn't US 71 get a corresponding Interstate route?
- From: My Land of Misery
- Re: Why didn't US 71 get a corresponding Interstate route?
- From: Premier Bush
- Re: Why didn't US 71 get a corresponding Interstate route?
- Prev by Date: Re: Weight Stations
- Next by Date: Re: MLOM site update
- Previous by thread: Re: Why didn't US 71 get a corresponding Interstate route?
- Next by thread: Re: Why didn't US 71 get a corresponding Interstate route?
- Index(es):