Re: And for the I-49 crowd
- From: Chris Bessert <bessert1@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 24 Feb 2006 20:53:29 -0500
Ronnie Dobbs wrote:
Magyar wrote:"Revive755" <build755@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
An elevated highway through an urban area? I didn't think such a
thing could even be considered anymore, considering how much
additional opposition a nice viaduct brings.
That's why viaducts aren't usually opposed when spanning water,
swamps, or railroad yards.
They don't look nice otherwise.
Also because they're not viaducts except for the ones over rail yards.
Um, yeah... no. Viaducts are simply long roadway bridges and don't need
to involve railroads at all, although they often do. Technically, the
definition of viaduct is, according to Merriam-Webster, is:
http://www.merriamwebster.com/dictionary/viaduct
Later,
Chris
--
Chris Bessert
Bessert1@xxxxxxx
http://www.michiganhighways.org
http://www.wisconsinhighways.org
http://www.ontariohighways.org
.
- References:
- And for the I-49 crowd
- From: Magyar
- Re: And for the I-49 crowd
- From: Anthony Kennerson
- Re: And for the I-49 crowd
- From: Magyar
- Re: And for the I-49 crowd
- From: Ronnie Dobbs
- Re: And for the I-49 crowd
- From: Anthony Kennerson
- Re: And for the I-49 crowd
- From: Presnwap
- Re: And for the I-49 crowd
- From: Revive755
- Re: And for the I-49 crowd
- From: Magyar
- Re: And for the I-49 crowd
- From: Ronnie Dobbs
- And for the I-49 crowd
- Prev by Date: Re: NY - E-ZPass toll plan builds on need for speed
- Next by Date: Daytrippin 2-24
- Previous by thread: Re: And for the I-49 crowd
- Next by thread: Re: And for the I-49 crowd
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|