Re: New tunnels for Chesapeake Bay-Bridge shot down
- From: Steve <smalpert@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 13:07:22 -0500
Larry Gross wrote:
Amen. Strangely, Repubs are usually the ones pushing for more roads. I'd like to think these captured toll funds could be used for other roads in the state, including perhaps an 895 extension to 85 (eliminating the N-S-N movement) or widening 81.RICHMOND -- The House of Delegates shot down plans to build expensive extra tunnels on the Chesapeake Bay Bridge-Tunnel Monday, saying the tunnels are not justified on the little-used span at this point.
"If we don't do this, we're going to have a $1 billion tunnel over there that has one-tenth the traffic of the Hampton Roads Bridge-Tunnel," said Del. Leo Wardrup, R-Virginia Beach. "By any measure, traffic there is comparatively light and will remain so for the foreseeable future."
Wardrup's bill requires the independent state agency that operates the 17.6-mile bridge-tunnel to obtain General Assembly approval before taking any more steps to build two additional tunnels.
While approval isn't likely in the immediate future, lawmakers said the project would be authorized if in-depth traffic projections justify it down the road.
"We need that data presented," said Del. Jeion Ward, D-Hampton. "If you can convince us it is needed, and the funding is there, that it won't impact the commonwealth in a negative way, then OK."
Bridge officials have been stockpiling money for several years to build two additional tunnels, and raised tolls by 20 percent in 2004 to help pay for them.
Wardrup's bill was introduced as a result of a Daily Press investigation last summer that revealed the little-known plans for additional tunnels, and detailed how bridge commissioners routinely took expensive trips, including one to Paris capped by large dinner tab at a topless cabaret.
Lawmakers were not pleased, said Del. Tom Gear, R-Hampton. "Everybody I talked to was angry about it," he said.
Wardrup and Del. Lynwood W. Lewis, D-Accomac, exchanged some edgy words over the bill.
Lewis argued that the bridge was well managed and that the extra tunnels would be needed in 20 years to handle projected traffic increases. He said additional tunnel construction was implied in General Assembly approval in the 1990s to build two extra lanes on the span.
"If this is a bad investment, it could fall to the taxpayers of Virginia to pay off this debt," Wardrup shot back, noting that the bridge commission defaulted on bonds in the 1970s in the "largest municipal bankruptcy in U.S. history."
Those bonds were repaid after the state refused to bail out the bridge commission.
Killing the extra tunnels would be a breach of trust, and would leave open the possibility that the bay bridge would someday become as congested as the Hampton Roads Bridge-Tunnel is now, Lewis argued.
"The citizens of the Eastern Shore want these new tunnels," he said.
Wardrup countered by noting that a 2005 state audit determined that additional tunnels were premature and that the toll increase to help pay for them was not justified through a comprehensive traffic study.
Lawmakers stood on the sidelines during the 10-minute exchange and voted on party lines to approve the bill. The vote was 60-37. Democrats, as a rule, objected.
Later, Republicans said they voted for it because they were uncomfortable with allowing additional tunnels to go ahead - even if paid for by motorists charged $12 each way (the highest in the country) - while other transportation priorities clearly are more pressing.
The bay bridge handles 3.5 million vehicles - roughly 10,000 a day - and traffic dropped slightly last year. Traffic is estimated to increase to roughly 5 million by 2025.
http://www.dailypress.com/news/local/dp-63630sy0jan31,0,2890267.story?coll=dp-news-local-final
-- Steve Alpert MIT - B.S. '05, M.S. (Transportation) '06 http://web.mit.edu/smalpert/www/roads .
- References:
- New tunnels for Chesapeake Bay-Bridge shot down
- From: Larry Gross
- New tunnels for Chesapeake Bay-Bridge shot down
- Prev by Date: Re: I-70 / I-71 Multiplex Update (sorta)
- Next by Date: Re: Who to contact about a deadly stretch of road.
- Previous by thread: New tunnels for Chesapeake Bay-Bridge shot down
- Next by thread: Changes to I-81 considered in Va General Assembly
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
