Re: Interstates that may have been poorly routed (Long)
- From: "Revive755" <build755@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 30 Jan 2006 19:19:23 -0800
>Jake Brzeskiewicz" <triplemultip...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>I-95 should've been routed from Petersburg, VA through Raleigh, NC to
>Fayetteville.
>And I-40 should've been sent from Raleigh to Norfolk.
>Nonsense. That is almost northeast from Raleigh to Norfolk and would
>have left a significant portion of the East Coast lacking interstate
>access (from Norfolk to Charleston). Norfolk already had plenty of
>interstate access; Wilmington has only the one (for now, that is).
Norfolk only has acess from I-64 unless I-101 recently opened and I
missed any news about it. None of the I-x64's reach out of the metro
area to I-95 or any other route.
The Norfolk area could use a north-south interstate, an east-west,
and/or a southwest-northeast interstate.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Interstates that may have been poorly routed (Long)
- From: froggie
- Re: Interstates that may have been poorly routed (Long)
- From: John Lansford
- Re: Interstates that may have been poorly routed (Long)
- References:
- Interstates that may have been poorly routed (Long)
- From: Revive755
- Re: Interstates that may have been poorly routed (Long)
- From: H . B . Elkins
- Re: Interstates that may have been poorly routed (Long)
- From: Scott M. Kozel
- Re: Interstates that may have been poorly routed (Long)
- From: Jake Brzeskiewicz
- Re: Interstates that may have been poorly routed (Long)
- From: John Lansford
- Interstates that may have been poorly routed (Long)
- Prev by Date: Re: Interstates that may have been poorly routed (Long)
- Next by Date: Re: Interstate database info
- Previous by thread: Re: Interstates that may have been poorly routed (Long)
- Next by thread: Re: Interstates that may have been poorly routed (Long)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
