Re: Serious, moderate discussion about Wesley Snipes.
- From: nat <esenter@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2008 21:00:48 -0500
JackneySneeb@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
On Jun 21, 5:03 am, "Richard Macdonald" <rmacdon...@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
And would you know, the first thing those alleged anarchists
did was to form their own Government.
This is the irony of the state-worshippers' delusion
Define "state-worshipper".
They revere
those who revolted against their lawful "government" as heroes, but
what did those people do? They committed treason, disobeyed the law,
became cop killers and fought dirty. Then, after telling old King
George and Parliament, "Phooey on your laws! We spit on them! To hell
with your taxes!" they set up a brand new version of what they
rebelled against (with themselves in charge, of course).
So they set up a monarchy?
Why is the truth so difficult to accept by an anarchist?
As George
Carlin said, "They were just ordinary slave owners who wanted to be
free!"
Here ornery malloy throws in nonsense with no rhyme or reason.
Yet anyone who questions the "authority" of the gang of
violent thugs they put in place of British rule, well you're just
scofflaws!
You got a question, ornery malloy? You have yet to say anything intelligent.
Were they right to want to overthrow the state? Yes. Were they
justified in doing the same thing to Americans that the King and
Parliament had done to them? Only if hypocrisy is justified.
Newsflash!
Throwing off a monarch and setting up a republic ain't hypocritical, anarchyboy.
(Anarchists can't handle the truth.)
Ole Jackey Sneeb must confuse revolutionaries with anarchists.
Hint, not all revolutionaries are anarchists, in fact damn few are.
And not all anarchists are cop killers, either. Not all accountants
are IRS collaborators, for that matter. All tax collectors are
thieves, though.
--Jackney Sneeb
A hypocrite would be someone who cashes his govt check while bitchin' about the taxes that provide for his govt check.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Serious, moderate discussion about Wesley Snipes.
- From: JackneySneeb@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Serious, moderate discussion about Wesley Snipes.
- References:
- Re: Serious, moderate discussion about Wesley Snipes.
- From: JackneySneeb@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Serious, moderate discussion about Wesley Snipes.
- From: nat
- Re: Serious, moderate discussion about Wesley Snipes.
- From: JackneySneeb@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Serious, moderate discussion about Wesley Snipes.
- From: nat
- Re: Serious, moderate discussion about Wesley Snipes.
- From: JackneySneeb@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Serious, moderate discussion about Wesley Snipes.
- From: nat
- Re: Serious, moderate discussion about Wesley Snipes.
- From: JackneySneeb@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Serious, moderate discussion about Wesley Snipes.
- From: nat
- Re: Serious, moderate discussion about Wesley Snipes.
- From: JackneySneeb@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Serious, moderate discussion about Wesley Snipes.
- From: cpt banjo
- Re: Serious, moderate discussion about Wesley Snipes.
- From: Richard Macdonald
- Re: Serious, moderate discussion about Wesley Snipes.
- From: JackneySneeb@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Serious, moderate discussion about Wesley Snipes.
- Prev by Date: Re: Serious, moderate discussion about Wesley Snipes.
- Next by Date: Re: Serious, moderate discussion about Wesley Snipes.
- Previous by thread: Re: Serious, moderate discussion about Wesley Snipes.
- Next by thread: Re: Serious, moderate discussion about Wesley Snipes.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|