Re: Serious, moderate discussion about Wesley Snipes.
- From: john_kulp@xxxxxxxxxxx (John Kulp)
- Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 16:54:10 GMT
On Thu, 19 Jun 2008 11:00:12 -0500, nat <esenter@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
JackneySneeb@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
On May 4, 11:43 am, Personable Tiger
<PersonableTigerontheWestCo...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Paul Thomas wrote:
When you take and make efforts to hamper the garnishments and attachments
that they bump it up - after another round of due process - to a criminal
case.
That is a form of authoritarianism.
It IS authoritarianism. Paul Thomas IS an authoritarian.
--Jackney Sneeb
In the American system, the LAW is the authority.
Hence, no individual is entitled to his own private interpretation of
the law.
Sure they are. They just go to the slammer when they're wrong.
You get it backwards, again, ornery malloy. It is YOU who is the
believer in authoritarianism.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Serious, moderate discussion about Wesley Snipes.
- From: JackneySneeb@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Serious, moderate discussion about Wesley Snipes.
- References:
- Re: Serious, moderate discussion about Wesley Snipes.
- From: JackneySneeb@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Serious, moderate discussion about Wesley Snipes.
- From: nat
- Re: Serious, moderate discussion about Wesley Snipes.
- Prev by Date: Re: Serious, moderate discussion about Wesley Snipes.
- Next by Date: FT: Ex-UBS employee pleads guilty in tax case
- Previous by thread: Re: Serious, moderate discussion about Wesley Snipes.
- Next by thread: Re: Serious, moderate discussion about Wesley Snipes.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|