More about the I Represent Satan org
- From: "Wolf" <wolfgangsmutz@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 24 May 2008 17:56:13 -0700
From: Peter Dorsett [mailto:theinfowizard@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Saturday, May 24, 2008 8:27 AM
To: 1Peter Dorsett
Subject: Heads-up Alert, IRS Capitulates: US~Observer
http://www.usobserver.com/archive/may-08/irs-capitulates.htm
IRS Capitulates
Moran's Jeep Returned
By Edward Snook
Investigative Reporter
Montrose, Colorado In our last edition the
US~Observer published a front page article titled,
"64 Felony Charges Beaten Team Minns Levels IRS DOJ
<http://www.usobserver.com/archive/march-08/team-minns.htm> ." This
riveting expose gave in-depth coverage about the solid defeat
inflicted on the IRS by Houston, Texas attorney Michael Minns, the
architect of a defense for a Montrose, CA couple, James and Pamela
Moran, standing trial on 64 counts of sundry tax crimes. With the
acquittal on all counts this reporter issued a challenge to get
the Morans' Jeep back.
This challenge was answered on April 23, 2008, when the Internal
Revenue Service (IRS) quietly, and ever so discreetly, capitulated
to the trial outcome and returned the Morans' Jeep, stolen from
them by the IRS in 2001. Incidentally, the same year the Jeep was
illegally stolen, Minns' book, "How to survive the IRS" was released
by Barricade Press.
<http://www.usobserver.com/archive/may-08/images/JeepReturn3.jpg>
Most will only speculate regarding the return of the automobile but
this reporter has researched some facts in this case that may shed
some light on what did occur to cause the IRS to take the Jeep away
from the Morans in the first place. The good news is this vehicle
is once again housed under the roof of the Morans' garage, only
after they suffered terribly from the malicious prosecution that
reigned down upon them for seven years. This terror included two
jury trials in Federal Court and a successful appeal to the 9th
Circuit Court of Appeals.
The ordeal began over seven years ago when the IRS, from orders on
high, attacked an organization called Anderson Ark Associates (AAA)
located in Costa Rica and the United States. The Morans along with
many other completely innocent investors were deemed criminals and
pursued by abusive IRS agents who were more intent on convictions
than of conducting a legitimate investigation and then determining
the truth.
In the Morans' case the indictments were based on a series of
misrepresentations initiated by biased Certified Public Accountant,
Joseph H. Moschetti, located in Grand Junction, CO, who may have been
fearful of losing a client to AAA. He told Criminal Investigative
Department (CID) agent Michelle Hagemann (with whom it was disclosed
during the Morans' second trial that he had a personal relationship
with) about the organization and she ultimately lead the raid against
the Morans' home and pursued the indictment against these two elderly
people. The Morans' home was assaulted by armed dragoons that broke
down their door, confiscated records that could be used in the
Morans' defense and seized a new Jeep, leaving the Morans' with a
ten year old truck, which was considered to be worthless by the IRS.
During the first "now proven false conviction" trial Hagemann gave
false testimony against the Morans, leading to a conviction on
all 64 counts. Facing a long jail sentence the Morans appealed the
convictions based on the premise the judge denied them the right to
express their beliefs for participating in the alleged tax scam. It
needs to be said, the truth only comes out when dealing with the
Internal Revenue Service and the Department of Justice once in a blue
moon and only with the assistance of exceptional legal council,
able to counter the deceptions and manipulations of the prosecution,
combined with the assistance of unconstitutional court practices,
withheld evidence and ridiculous, costly procedures.
However, in the second trial the Morans new counsel Michael Minns
grilled Hagemann about her relationship with her now known source,
Moschetti. Minns repeatedly asked Hagemann about being escorted to
a AAA meeting in Grand Junction by Moschetti, and why she gave him
her private home phone number, usually guarded by agents, resulting
in her admission that he was her personal tax preparer. Hagemann
did have the faint decency to admit that it would be inappropriate
if in fact the CPA was getting a finders fee reward for turning the
Morans over to the IRS. She added that if it came up she would refer
it to someone else since the relationship she shared with Moschetti
would have created a conflict of interest. The bottom line is this
Moschetti had Hagemanns' home phone number, he was calling her
a lot, he offered to let her bug his office phone and listen in
on his clients and he went with her to a meeting where the Morans
spoke, (assisting Hagemann in concealing her "undercover" status)
with another client of his who he didn't inform the identity of
Hagemann to. The US~Observer's strong opinion is that Moschetti
is an undercover agent of the IRS and like a majority of agents,
he and Hagemann openly practice out and out deception and literal
entrapment. In short they both "live a lie." Those na ve customers
that employ Moschetti as their CPA had better hope that he isn't
taping their conversations and turning those tapes over to the IRS.
There were other agents that participated in the conspiracy
against the Morans. One such agent was CID agent James Dowling
(undercover name Jim Mitchell). His testimony in the first trial
was well orchestrated by the prosecution and not challenged by the
defense attorneys. Minns did not commit these errors in the second
trial. During the questioning Dowling stated that he no longer worked
directly for the IRS but that he worked for another entity and was
contracted out to the government indirectly. Interestingly, when
Minns asked him if that entity was in any way similar to Blackwater
USA, a private intelligence and security firm, the court ruled
the question out of order and struck it from the record. Minns
is not convinced that the jury struck it from their minds or the
pool of evidence. Dowling testified in the first trial that he did
not accept the hospitality of AAA to stay at a Costa Rican Bed and
Breakfast while attending an educational conference, but instead,
fearing for his life due to the dangerous people involved with AAA,
stayed at a hotel alone. In the second trial, after very tenacious
and professional questioning by Minns, his story changed. Dowling,
a married undercover IRS special agent finally admitted that he
shared a room with his undercover co-agent and partner, not his
wife, Diane Taggert (undercover name Diane Target). I wonder which
partner slept in the bathtub. According to the Morans, James being a
Viet Nam veteran and former minister and his wife Pamela, the church
organist, Sunday School teacher and cookie-baking homemaker, Taggert
dressed provocatively in short hot pants, so much so that many of
the conference's more religious attendees were uncomfortable. This
testimony gave the second jury a better understanding of who Dowling
really is, contributing in part to the acquittal.
The Morans got a release of lien on their home March 28, 2008
(immediately after the verdicts were read) but the Jeep was
still held hostage. To better understand why this was so, one must
understand the IRS mechanisms for fear mongering. The IRS lost their
"unconstitutional" seizure rights when the Morans walked out of the
Seattle courtroom innocent of all 64 stacked felony charges. The IRS
was also notified that Minns would file suit for the return of the
Jeep yet they dragged their feet in returning the car. In addition,
when the IRS attacked the Morans the stories made national headlines
describing how the agency was breaking up the largest tax scam in
history. In fact the conviction of the Morans is still on the IRS
website. Since the acquittal, the story is non-existent in the media.
Minns had an interesting perspective on this phenomenon and to
why the Jeep was not returned right away. "I have two guesses
that are probably based on the truth. First, the story of the
Morans' acquittal was blacked out in the main stream media with
the exception of the US~Observer and her sister news outlets that
possess a huge reader base. Second, the IRS has an extraordinarily
successful public relations department. They are always timely when
broadcasting their indictments, arrests and convictions of those
they target. However, when they lose a case, such as this rare
defeat, silencing the media becomes a high priority for damage
control. News of convictions always precedes April 15th but news
of an acquittal is held up until after tax day when the public is
not heeding IRS warnings. That was obviously the IRS's intent in
stringing the Morans along for four months.
Another point the IRS would like kept from the public is the cost
of holding the Jeep for seven years. Over those years the Jeep was
driven to Denver, then to the auction block, removal from the block
when the Morans won the appeal, back to the auction block prior
to the second trial last December when the odds of an acquittal
were stacked against the Morans and finally back to storage upon
the successful outcome of the last trial. Average rates for forced
storage exceed $50 a day, times approximately 2,555 days, for a
storage bill exceeding $125,000. Add to this total; interest,
cost of starting the engine once a month and transportation,
the cost to the taxpayers is probably over $240,000. Even if the
government got a discount on these expenses it's fair to say the
cost far outweighed the value of the Jeep.
While in Denver for business after April 15th the Morans were
asked to pick up the Jeep. They declined to take possession after
inspecting the car and finding a dead battery, tires with cracking
sidewalls, cracked wiper blades and a cracked windshield. Telling
the IRS, "We want our property back but would you drive this car with
these tires over the mountains in snowy conditions?" The attendant at
the storage yard agreed with Morans' assessment, and again when Jim
Moran stated to IRS agents, "So don't you think at the very least,
since you aren't going to apologize, that you should deliver the
jeep back to our home in Montrose where it was confiscated?"
On Wednesday April 23, 2008, the Jeep was delivered back to a
Montrose dealership with a new battery but still outfitted with
cracked tires, a cracked windshield and deteriorated wipers. Also,
absent when the Jeep was handed over was agent Michelle Hagemann,
the pistol packing mama, who seized the Morans' Jeep under the
threat of armed force. The two sheepish agents that were present
denied having anything to do with the original raid.
The IRS/CID agent remarked to the Morans' attorney that he was
puzzled. "How did they win all 64 counts? Just one count would let
the IRS keep the jeep." Minns gave Jim's and Pam's response: "They
were innocent." Hard for any government agent to fathom while working
in a society where people are deemed guilty until proven innocent.
<http://www.usobserver.com/archive/may-08/images/JeepReturn1.jpg>
Now the Morans are trying to return to a normal life visiting family
and friends, while thanking God, their renowned attorney Michael
Minns, Minns' daughter, attorney Rain Minns and their Seattle,
WA attorneys Peter Mair and Jon Zulauf for their victory.
In retrospect, the public should be fully aware that many Americans
who were involved with AAA are currently sitting in a prison cell
with their lives completely ruined simply because of the lack of
a competent attorney like Michael Minns.
And most Americans still believe they live in a "free" country!...
Editor's Note: One very unique and important defense tactic used by
Minns was to ask the various CID agents if they had taken classes
given by the IRS on how to be effective witnesses and thus sway
unsuspecting jurors. Minns knows that taking such a class is a
requirement for all CID agents and he also knows that jurors want to
hear the straight truth, not an acting job by dangerous and abusive
agents of the IRS. It would behoove all attorneys who represent
clients in tax cases to expose this fact in their criminal tax cases.
----
Peter Dorsett does not accept any liability or responsibility
for the accuracy of the information being provided by others on
Heads-Up Alert notices. It is your sole responsibility and duty,
to verify the accuracy and the legality of any information you are
viewing on the Internet.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: More about the Inmate Rose Sitings
- From: Paul Thomas
- Re: More about the Inmate Rose Sitings
- Prev by Date: Weekly Perf Report- Online Calls & BTST (Cash/Deriv)Dated 19th To 23rd May 2008
- Next by Date: More about the Larken Rose Representing Satan org.
- Previous by thread: Weekly Perf Report- Online Calls & BTST (Cash/Deriv)Dated 19th To 23rd May 2008
- Next by thread: Re: More about the Inmate Rose Sitings
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|