Re: Kicking the Dragon

Another moron comes forth to support Barkin Larken.

Hey idiot, Larken was not jailed for expressing an opinion. He was jailed for the crime of evading his taxes. And he was only sentenced to and served one year, because the judge told him, upon conviction, that he would be lenient, if he and Tessa paid their taxes, penalties and interest. Good ole Larken hustled like crazy and did just that.

He never even tried to make any of his idiot arguments to the court. Instead he relied on the Cheek "I am stupid" defense. And he did so so stupidly he lost. A jury of his peers didn't buy his claim of stupidity and convicted him.

But then, morons like you actually think he is a martyr.


"Wolf" <wolfgangsmutz@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:bhjZj.393$v94.195@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx



Conventional wisdom said he was wrong.
The evidence said he was right.
The government's reaction to him said a whole lot more.



If you think there's no such thing as a political prisoner in the United States, think again. Larken Rose spent a year in prison, not for hurting anyone, not for lying about anything, not for hiding anything, not for cheating or stealing, but simply for voicing an opinion which those in positions of power didn't approve of.



The book which chronicles the eight year saga of this
"tax heretic" lays out in detail the sometimes amusing, sometimes infuriating tale of a modern-day witch-hunt,
a corrupt and dishonest government bent on harassing, demonizing, persecuting, silencing and imprisoning those
who publicly question the gospel according to the powers
that be. The disturbing facts of the case pull back the
facade of "due process" and the "rule of law" to reveal
the United States government for what it has devolved
into: a gang of lawless criminals interested only in
preserving their own power by any means necessary.


Written almost entirely in prison, Kicking the Dragon (Confessions of a Tax Heretic) exposes truths about the
United States federal government which will disturb
every decent American, from the most devoted, patriotic
flag-waver, to the most apathetic, jaded cynic.


The government has gone to great lengths to keep you from hearing the truth about this story, for reasons which the tale itself makes obvious. Get your copy now before the powers that be come up with some new legal excuse for suppressing the truth.


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: new tax already
    ... stealing is that stealing means they have no legal right. ... huge expansion of power of government is the "themselves". ... opinion it will be hard to come to an understanding. ...
    (comp.sys.mac.advocacy)
  • Re: DC v Heller: Amicus Brief of the Real Linguists, Part I
    ... If you'd ever seen a picture of the Second Amendment in action... ... Where does the Constitution say you can't commit human sacrifices? ... IX.The United States in Congress assembled, shall have the sole and exclusive RIGHT and power of determining on peace and war... ... As the new Constitution was being created and debated, what did the participants say about whether individual states, AND the NATION of states, AND the Federal Government itself had rights?: ...
    (talk.politics.guns)
  • Re: The New Democrats - War Heroes
    ... > Constitution defines how one goes about "seizing power" as you put it. ... it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles ... He has refused his Assent to Laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the ... Legislature, a right inestimable to them and formidable to tyrants only. ...
    (soc.culture.iraq)
  • Re: The New Democrats - War Heroes
    ... >> all, if you say the Constitution defines how to seize power, you must know ... >the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, ... >it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles ... >Legislature, a right inestimable to them and formidable to tyrants only. ...
    (soc.culture.iraq)
  • Re: THE GREAT GOOSE GOOFS AGAIN was Re: What is an "Individual Right"?
    ... "Then there?s the original Virginia Bill of Rights, ... military power and the proper role of the military in a free ... The language makes no suggestion of a right to bear arms. ... "What is the meaning of government? ...
    (talk.politics.guns)