How a small loss, in a fractional banking scenario relates to a larger crash.
- From: phil scott <phil@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2007 13:33:12 -0800 (PST)
Ahh..No problem with the banks...its just 4.5% of assets in default.
Well that's not entirely it. 4.5% loss is over half of gross profits
in many cases, and even a greater percentage of the net. The hell
you say...still profitable.
Well not actually. You see their 'profits' are out on loan, to other
banks, and in stocks etc. and about 100 to ratio in support of
trillions and trillions of dollars in 'derivitives'... now that gets
hairy.
Here is how and why.
Ones profits are on paper, as paper declines in actual value profits
disappear, and not just profits but the base business and actual
assets of the bank decline in value, rendering it vastly more debt
than it can ever repay... and its depositors ...errr. Screwed.
All on a '4.5%' loss. When Parmalat (Italian dairy products) went
under a while back, direct losers were 7 billion or so... derivative
losses estimated close to a trillion. Not an opininon.
Search google with the term 'derivitive, losses, trillions' for a
range of white papers, govt and university studies on the magnitude of
the disaster.
Phil Scott
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: How a small loss, in a fractional banking scenario relates to a larger crash.
- From: Paul Thomas, CPA
- Re: How a small loss, in a fractional banking scenario relates to a larger crash.
- Prev by Date: Re: Nuclear power and a cure for Sharia law and all that lashing crap
- Next by Date: Re: No Requirement to WIthhold on Individuals
- Previous by thread: Fraud in the CPI
- Next by thread: Re: How a small loss, in a fractional banking scenario relates to a larger crash.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|
