Re: Has the Supreme Court defined what income is?
- From: "Robert Miller" <rober999@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 9 Jun 2007 20:13:57 -0600
"Richard Macdonald" <rmacdonald@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:6lPai.510$or4.355@xxxxxxxxxxx
"Robert Miller" <rober999@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in messageWhich law is that? I'm told it's in Title 26, but nobody seems to be able
news:532b9$466bb882$4b5b220d$26518@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
"Richard Macdonald" <rmacdonald@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:nnCai.2327$yS4.1137@xxxxxxxxxxx
"Paul Maffia" <pmaffia@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in messageSo your labor has no value?
news:xNqdnUwzfLzOQPfbnZ2dnUVZ_o-knZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"Robert Miller" <rober999@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:75dfb$466a443b$4b5b2328$19267@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Your labor cost you nothing so you have no cost to offset or reduce the
If my labor is my property, and I exchange it for someone else's
property
"money" there is no "gain".
gain. Your labor is not taxed, you retard, you income is.
It is not your labor that is taxed, it is the results of the sale
transaction.
I just finished laboring all morning in my yard and will not owe a
penny's
tax on that labor, ergo labor is not taxed, only any gain recognized
from
that labor that is taxed.
My labor has great VALUE, but ZERO COST BASIS
as I paid nothing to obtain my labor.
I exchange my labor at par.
So, you give it away free then.
My property (labor) for someone else's property (money).
An even swap. There is no profit or gain.
You show an error in gain calculation comprehension.
FMV received - Basis given = Gain recognoized
If labor is income let the IRS define income in the Revenue Code as
including "Wages for Labor". Why is that so difficult?
The receipt of payment, in money, goods, securities, or service,
in compensation for labor is Gross Income per 26 USC 61.
Your labor is not taxed, the payment for your labor is.
to
find it. Even Sheldon Cohen former IRS Commissioner and author in the
Tax Code couldn't cite it. You would think he was familiar with what he
wrote.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Has the Supreme Court defined what income is?
- From: Paul Thomas
- Re: Has the Supreme Court defined what income is?
- References:
- Has the Supreme Court defined what income is?
- From: Robert Miller
- Re: Has the Supreme Court defined what income is?
- From: Richard Macdonald
- Re: Has the Supreme Court defined what income is?
- From: Robert Miller
- Re: Has the Supreme Court defined what income is?
- From: Richard Macdonald
- Re: Has the Supreme Court defined what income is?
- From: Paul Maffia
- Re: Has the Supreme Court defined what income is?
- From: Robert Miller
- Re: Has the Supreme Court defined what income is?
- From: Paul Maffia
- Re: Has the Supreme Court defined what income is?
- From: Robert Miller
- Re: Has the Supreme Court defined what income is?
- From: Paul Maffia
- Re: Has the Supreme Court defined what income is?
- From: Richard Macdonald
- Re: Has the Supreme Court defined what income is?
- From: Robert Miller
- Re: Has the Supreme Court defined what income is?
- From: Richard Macdonald
- Has the Supreme Court defined what income is?
- Prev by Date: Re: Has the Supreme Court defined what income is?
- Next by Date: Re: Has the Supreme Court defined what income is?
- Previous by thread: Re: Has the Supreme Court defined what income is?
- Next by thread: Re: Has the Supreme Court defined what income is?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|