Re: Social Security Benefits Taxes?
- From: KEBSCHULLW@xxxxxxx
- Date: 29 Jan 2006 07:40:46 -0800
Richard Macdonald wrote:
> <KEBSCHULLW@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:1138301664.697279.208060@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> > The "monstrous moral outrage" is the IRS's attempt to cover-up and
> > paper over the fraudulent inclusion of itemized deduction recoveries in
> > the calculation of taxable Social Security benefits. See section 111(a)
> > of the Internal Revenue Code.
>
> Code Sec. 111. Recovery of tax benefit items
> (a) DEDUCTIONS
> Gross income does not include income attributable to the recovery during the
> taxable year of any amount deducted in any prior taxable year to the extent
> such amount did not reduce the amount of tax imposed by this chapter.
>
> Section 111(a) makes absolutely no reference to Social Security and no
> matter how much Social Security is taxed, the amount of taxable recovery,
> will NEVER CHANGE. Your assertion that 111(a) has any bearing on
> Taxable Social Security is specious and has no basis.
lil' dickie:
Section 111(a) does not have to reference the calculation of taxable
Social Security benefits because it is GROSS INCOME that is
ATTRIBUTABLE to the RECOVERY that is limited by section 111(a).
Including an ITEMIZED DEDUCTION RECOVERY in the calculation of taxable
Social Security benefits can result in the GROSS INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE to
the RECOVERY EXCEEDING the amount of the RECOVERY by up to 85 percent.
This result is prohibited by 26USC111(a) because the EXTENT that an
ITEMIZED DEDUCTION can reduce TAXABLE INCOME CANNOT EXCEED the amount
of the deduction. Therefore, the GROSS INCOME ATTRIBUTABLE to a
ITEMIZED DEDUCTION RECOVERY cannot exceed the amount of the RECOVERY by
the terms of section 111(a)..
It would be redundant to make a reference to Social Security in section
111(a) of the IRC.
Got it now?
Cheers,
WDK
>
> Now I do agree that recoveries of below the line (after AGI) deductions
> should not be included in the calculation of Taxable Social Security as
> they would have been deducted from AGI in prior periods AFTER any
> amount of Taxable Social Security was calculated, but that is a function
> of 26USC86 and not 111 and is the fault of Congress who wrote the
> current statute that included recoveries in the calculations, and not the
> IRS.
> So until you can show any citation of SOCIAL SECURITY in
> 26USC111, your assertion is baseless.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Social Security Benefits Taxes?
- From: Richard Macdonald
- Re: Social Security Benefits Taxes?
- References:
- Social Security Benefits Taxes?
- From: Charliec
- Re: Social Security Benefits Taxes?
- From: smithff33
- Re: Re: Social Security Benefits Taxes?
- From: VRWC10
- Re: Social Security Benefits Taxes?
- From: Don Priebe
- Re: Social Security Benefits Taxes?
- From: KEBSCHULLW
- Re: Social Security Benefits Taxes?
- From: Richard Macdonald
- Social Security Benefits Taxes?
- Prev by Date: Re: Intaxication
- Next by Date: Re: IRA contribution
- Previous by thread: Re: Social Security Benefits Taxes?
- Next by thread: Re: Social Security Benefits Taxes?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|