Re: Why does Andy continue to tell lies?
- From: "AK" <ak@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 02 Sep 2005 01:43:51 GMT
"Paul A Thomas" <taxman@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:11hep6pjmekcrbd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> "AK" <ak@xxxxxxx> wrote
> > Because you said so.
>
>
> Now why would you - all of the sudden - decide that what I say is the
truth?
>
> Why is it that you pick and chose what to believe?
Well, Paul - you are pretty stupid. But you usually only lie about things
that show your stupidity or your amoral character. Actually, supporting the
McKillip campaign by any amount tells a lot about your duplicity, Thomas.
But why would you lie? I guess because you thought if you could convince the
elections people that it was only $100, they would not have published your
name along with the amount of your contribution. Maybe you split it up so
you wouldn't get caught? Too bad the truth came out. (sarcasm)
----------------------------------------------
" Income within the meaning of IRC 61a carries
with it a general requirement of 'realization' ''.
(Helvering v. Horst, 311 US 112,115-16)
ak
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Why does Andy continue to tell lies?
- From: Paul A Thomas
- Re: Why does Andy continue to tell lies?
- References:
- Why does Andy make stuff up?
- From: Paul A Thomas
- Re: Why does Thomas make stuff up?
- From: AK
- Re: Why does Andy continue to tell lies?
- From: Paul A Thomas
- Re: Why does Andy continue to tell lies?
- From: AK
- Re: Why does Andy continue to tell lies?
- From: Paul A Thomas
- Why does Andy make stuff up?
- Prev by Date: Re: Strike 2 on Thomas
- Next by Date: Re: IRS's Multi-Billion Flimflam: "Double or Nothing" Taxation of Tax Refunds
- Previous by thread: Re: Why does Andy continue to tell lies?
- Next by thread: Re: Why does Andy continue to tell lies?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
