Re: Paul Thomas -sleeps tight
- From: "AK" <ak@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 02 Jul 2005 01:41:43 GMT
"Paul" <TaxMan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:11cbq2apk5llr1b@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> "AK" <ak@xxxxxxx> wrote
> > "Paul" <TaxMan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote
>
> >> "AK" <ak@xxxxxxx> wrote
> >> > Good hard work is great therapy,
> >>
> >>
> >> Is that why you can't keep a job?
> >
> > That's why I can stick to good jobs,
>
>
> So........why was it that you bounced around a lot?
>
> Was it the job that was bad, or the worker?
>
> If it was the job, why did you take it in the first place?
>
> Why did you leave a "good" job?
It's past 9 pm, and Paul's getting nasty again.
Sleep tight, little boy Thoma$.
----------------------------------------------
" Income within the meaning of IRC 61a carries
with it a general requirement of 'realization' ''.
(Helvering v. Horst, 311 US 112,115-16)
ak
.
- References:
- Re: Paul Thomas answers questions
- From: Paul A Thomas
- Re: Paul Thomas answers questions
- From: AK
- Re: Paul Thomas answers questions
- From: Paul A Thomas
- Re: Paul Thomas answers questions - sometimes even correct answers (but don't count on it)
- From: AK
- Re: Paul Thomas answers questions
- From: Paul A Thomas
- Re: Paul Thomas answers questions with his best guesses
- From: AK
- Re: Paul Thomas answers questions
- From: Paul A Thomas
- Re: Paul Thomas can't answer questions
- From: AK
- Re: Paul Thomas can answer questions
- From: AK
- Re: Paul Thomas answers questions
- Prev by Date: Re: Paul Thomas can answer questions
- Next by Date: Re: Give it a try, Paul
- Previous by thread: Re: Paul Thomas can answer questions
- Next by thread: Re: Sleep tight, Paul Thomas
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|