Re: 'Climate science'
- From: Man_of_Mind <baron.von.mind@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2010 11:20:17 -0600
On 1/12/2010 11:04 AM, dodger dilbert was still whining at:
>> On 1/12/2010 12:06 AM, dodger dilbert was still whining at:
Man_of_Mind was laughing at:
----
Oh, so now it's "lengthy"?
Oh very much so.
How 'lengthy' would that be, dodger?
Years worth.
--Or, do you suck at simple arithmetic as bad as you do at logic?
I suspect the google archive of your multiple socks
And how many 'socks' have you posted with, Spammy/Rectum Tired?
--Several hundreds by now, no?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: 'Climate science'
- From: roger gilbert
- Re: 'Climate science'
- References:
- Re: 'Climate science' is an oxy***.
- From: Frank
- Re: 'Climate science' is an oxy***.
- From: HH&C
- Re: 'Climate science' is an oxy***.
- From: Dan
- Re: 'Climate science'
- From: Curly Surmudgeon
- Re: 'Climate science'
- From: Retief
- Re: 'Climate science'
- From: Curly Surmudgeon
- Re: 'Climate science'
- From: Retief
- Re: 'Climate science'
- From: Curly Surmudgeon
- Re: 'Climate science'
- From: Retief
- Re: 'Climate science'
- From: Man_of_Mind
- Re: 'Climate science'
- From: roger gilbert
- Re: 'Climate science'
- From: Man_of_Mind
- Re: 'Climate science'
- From: roger gilbert
- Re: 'Climate science'
- From: Man_of_Mind
- Re: 'Climate science'
- From: roger gilbert
- Re: 'Climate science'
- From: Man_of_Mind
- Re: 'Climate science'
- From: roger gilbert
- Re: 'Climate science' is an oxy***.
- Prev by Date: Re: 'Climate science'
- Next by Date: Re: 'Climate science'
- Previous by thread: Re: 'Climate science'
- Next by thread: Re: 'Climate science'
- Index(es):