Re: 'Climate science'

On Sun, 10 Jan 2010 04:53:45 +0000 (UTC), Curly Surmudgeon
<CurlySurmudgeon@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Sat, 09 Jan 2010 22:29:49 -0600, Retief <nospam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Sun, 10 Jan 2010 03:53:59 +0000 (UTC), Curly Surmudgeon
<CurlySurmudgeon@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

Even if some single study were corrupted, intentionally or
intentionally, it does not negate the vast compilation of world wide
data and 90%+ of scientists and climatologists who stand by the massive
data.

If you address this statement honestly, you not be able to support the
claim of "90%+" -- you are likely to be hard pressed to even produce a
majority who stand behind it.

Retief

First link googled, read and weep:

Squirrely, remember I suggested you be honest? But nay, you trot out
the same old garbage...

updated 1:02 a.m. EST, Tue January 20, 2009

Surveyed scientists agree global warming is real

(CNN) -- Human-induced global warming is real, according to a recent U.S.
survey based on the opinions of 3,146 scientists. However there remains
divisions between climatologists and scientists from other areas of earth
sciences as to the extent of human responsibility.

"31,072 American scientists against AGW"

http://motls.blogspot.com/2008/05/31072-american-scientists-against-agw.html

Where is that 90%, Curly?



Retief
.

Quantcast