Re: 'Climate science'

On Sat, 09 Jan 2010 16:24:13 -0700, Winston_Smith <not_real@xxxxxxxxx>

Dan <dnadan56@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Of course, one side (ours) has science to back them up, the other side
(deniers) rely on word of mouth and fabricated materials.

Snicker, guffaw. Your "side" is the ones caught fudging the data.

Accusations that _some_ data, a trivially small amount, _might_ have been
twisted. If that happened then it is intolerable and those scientists
will be routed out of their positions.

Even if some single study were corrupted, intentionally or intentionally,
it does not negate the vast compilation of world wide data and 90%+ of
scientists and climatologists who stand by the massive data.

Who's God Do You Kill For?