Re: 0bama can't count straight - again

On Jan 8, 12:18 pm, Dan <dnada...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
HH&C wrote:
On Jan 8, 1:29 am, Dan <dnada...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
HH&C wrote:
On Jan 7, 10:14 pm, Jeff M <nos...@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
HH&C wrote:
On Jan 7, 9:31 pm, Jeff M <nos...@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
HH&C wrote:
On Jan 7, 10:24 am, Jeff M <nos...@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
... and you have blind faith in military tribunals and in the
politicians deciding to ignore our established judicial process whenever
it's convenient?
Why is a muilitary tribunal good for service men and women, but not
good enough for admitted terrorists?
Why do you hate our military so much?
Courts Martial serve a military purpose, and are not in any way
equivalent to these military tribunals.  Apples and oranges.
Why do you hate America so much (and behave like a juvenile)?
So our men and women in uniform will never face a military tribunal?
The military tribunal system for the "War on Terror" is entirely
separate and utterly unlike the judicial system under the UCMJ.  Your
prior non-judicial punishments don't count.  Do try to read for
comprehension.
So you've promised that our men and women will never face a military
tribunal, yes?
Are you too stupid to read, too ignorant, or just playing stupid?

Three choices only, please answer the question.

Dan

You're such a pleasant person.  Were you abused as a child?

No, just annoyed at a person who asks a nonsensical question three times
in a row after said question was answered...

Nothing Jeff posted implied or said military personnel were immune from
Court Martial or "Military Tribunal", yet you ask the same question
THREE TIMES.  He directly called a distinction between the "Military
Tribunal" proposed for the detainees at Guantanamo and any "Military
Tribunal" that would be used for US Military Personnel, yet you persist
in trying to cloud the issue.

Why?

It appeared to me that he avoided answering the question three times.

You will please to notice I withheld comment until the THIRD instance of
your obtuseness.  I think I exhibited extraordinary restraint and
patience with you.  But, as with a 3 year old who asks the same question
over and over after being answered in a variety of ways solely to bring
attention to himself, I got impatient (though not using the same
verbiage I would use with said 3 year old)...

I think you should experience extraordinary restraint. A beautiful,
tight fitting white jacket.

If you expect to be taken seriously as an adult, behave as one.  When my
older students act like 2nd graders, I treat them as 2nd graders, and
tell them why.  The behavior usually doesn't last long.  Would that you
were as mature.
Dan

Dear God, he's a school teacher. It all makes sense now.
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: 0bama cant count straight - again
    ... politicians deciding to ignore our established judicial process whenever ... equivalent to these military tribunals. ... Nothing Jeff posted implied or said military personnel were immune from Court Martial or "Military Tribunal", yet you ask the same question THREE TIMES. ... When my older students act like 2nd graders, I treat them as 2nd graders, and tell them why. ...
    (misc.survivalism)
  • Has Bertie made a Big mistake?
    ... be no discussion with respect to the Tribunals or anything concerning ... Bertie Ahern. ... He was elected, by due process, by the electorate to be leader of the ... He has opened the door for the Judicial process to get at the truth. ...
    (soc.culture.irish)