Re: Deployed Troops Donate to Obama 6-1 Over McCain



"Curly Surmudgeon" <cs@xxxxxxx> wrote in message news:pan.2008.08.30.01.19.42.365333@xxxxxxxxxx
On Fri, 29 Aug 2008 19:06:05 -0500, Jerry wrote:



"Curly Surmudgeon" <cs@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:pan.2008.08.29.06.17.35.561789@xxxxxxxxxx
On Thu, 28 Aug 2008 23:41:21 -0500, Jerry wrote:



"Curly Surmudgeon" <cs@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:pan.2008.08.29.04.05.08.618140@xxxxxxxxxx
On Thu, 28 Aug 2008 21:36:22 -0500, Jerry wrote:

Again, show _one_ instance that I lied, I defy you.

Why again? What was wrong with my last instance?

You've not done so.

I challange you to show a single instance of my lying.

You _cannot_ do so.

Claiming that you have is a lie. Claiming that you can is a lie.

1- This is a lie by Curly. I showed an instance of your lying.
Claiming that I showed an instance where Curly lied, does not make that I lie that I told. It is a lie to say that it is a lie.
My proof is in the link found below.



You are playing childish games. I have already posted that you lied when you
called me a liar.

I merely repeat your admission. _You_ stated that you tell lies.


2- This is another lie by Curly. I never made an admission of being a liar. I will occasionally stretch the truth to avoid offending someone, just enough top save some embarrassment without actually lying, like when I tell you you had a good idea, you are smart, or that it may take you several pages of searching to find where you lied. I essentially was giving you some wiggle room so that you could retreat gracefully, but you couldn't figure it out. So besides being a liar, that makes you a dumbass too.



This means that you lied again by saying that I only
"claimed" to do so.
Link to where I already made my claim:
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.machines.cnc/msg/e167c12e90d72482?hl=en&dmode=source

You now claim that I'm lying for repeating your admission?


3- This is where Curly repeats his lie. Repeating a lie is the same as lying again, so this is another lie by Curly.



Your problem is that you automatically assume that someone is lying just
because they have a different opinion / point of view, than the one you are
stuck on. If we judged you by the same standards, there would be no need to
nominate you, we would simply crown you as the king of lies.

Cease telling me what I think or assume. Your words, you admitted being a
liar. Then you retracted that admission, which is it?


4- This is another lie by Curly, pretending that I made some kind of admission to lying. I post links to all of my statements that may require proof, and in the obvious statements where I call you a liar, no proof is needed. You have become irrelevant. You are just noise here. Every word you post is in doubt and there is a cloud over your every word. You are a liar and irrelevant and just noise here.



Below is a link using search terms "liar curly". You will see that it
returns over 16,000 matches. Take your own challenge, or are you afraid of
what you might find? It shouldn't take you more than the first few pages to
find out what the rest of us know about you. You have become irrelevant.
You are just noise here.
http://groups.google.com/groups/search?q=liar+curly&start=0&hl=en&;

And you'll see that they invariably relate to catching HH&C, gunner and
others in lies. I do not tolerate associates who lie.


5- This is another lie by Curly. Anyone can click the link and see that about the sixth search result shows that you are a proven busted liar. That statement comes from an entirely different newsgroup that this one. They also told you to f*** yourself, hopefully you will heed that advice. Subsequent pages provide other similar such statements. So it isn't just me calling you a liar, it's epidemic across the internet. Do your own research, take your own challenge, I'm not your secretary.



If you do not lie then why did you say you did and which claim should we
believe? I'm giving you the benefit of doubt here, they're your own
words, which is factual.


6- This is another lie by Curly by repeating the same lie. I did not say that I lied. Perhaps you misread something, Maybe you lied and thought it was me.



And you've still not provided any evidence to your claim that I lied.
None, not one iota, you cannot. If you are simply trying to reverse the
argument in retaliation, without evidence, then does that not constitute a
lie?


You have lied six times in this post, as I have enumerated above. You have lied as I provided proof in our previous discussion of this subject, proven in the links I provided. You have been busted in the forums on numerous occasions, and yet lie even more stating that it was someone else.

You have become irrelevant here. Nobody with a brain cell can take anything you say as the truth. All of your words are in doubt. You are just noise here.



.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: The anonymous caller
    ... If you ever want to know when Harry is lying, you will notice he will go into a very boring, long winded description of the lie. ... A pathological liar is usually defined as someone who lies incessantly to get their way and does so with little concern for others. ... A compulsive liar is defined as someone who lies out of habit. ...
    (rec.boats)
  • Re: Another Claim For Mark Probert To Prove!
    ... >>>I will not play your stupid game of Liar! ... >> caught lying. ... Subject: Re: I Don't Suppose Rich Shewmaker Can See Any Lies Here? ... Except that's not what you stated, so not like Jacob, you lie again to cover ...
    (misc.health.alternative)
  • Re: Someone please inform Gary Lima...
    ... Had EVERYONE not been lying then, ... Yeah, that's a topic which puts the lie to a lot of y'all, then and now. ... you liked and respected predators and lying ... manipulators - then and now.. ...
    (rec.arts.marching.drumcorps)
  • Excuses Given For Lying
    ... Excuses given for lying. ... Thus the statement "I had to lie" is never true, ... "Lying", by Jonathan Wallace ... While many will appeal to the life or death argument to defend lying, ...
    (misc.health.alternative)
  • Re: Mark Probert The LIAR & HYPOCRITE
    ... >>> Rich can see that that is a LIE. ... >>> You were wrong and LYING, as usual you have NO INTEGRITY. ... YOU are both a LIAR and a HYPOCRITE ... and Mark is not the topic of discussion. ...
    (misc.health.alternative)