Re: Are Border Guard Checkpoints Constitutional?

From: "Honus" <Honus@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 30 Apr 2008 05:37:33 -0700

<Conservative@xxxxxx> wrote in message
news:fv9nnq$4gv$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

In misc.survivalism, RadicalModerate <radicalmoderate@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

IMO, if the USA really cared about border integrity, there would be a 1
to
10 mile frontier of exclusive Federal jurisdiction on the US<=>Mexico
border.
This might require a Constitutional amendment though.

We need a MUCH bigger and stronger Federal Government! The whole problem
is that these States think that they have jurisdiction. What partof
UNITED States don't they understand?

And what part of -States- don't you understand?

.

References:
- Are Border Guard Checkpoints Constitutional?
  - From: Non Sequiter
- Re: Are Border Guard Checkpoints Constitutional?
  - From: RadicalModerate
- Re: Are Border Guard Checkpoints Constitutional?
  - From: Conservative

Prev by Date: Re: Three percent of homes are completly vacant
Next by Date: Re: Three percent of homes are completly vacant
Previous by thread: Re: Are Border Guard Checkpoints Constitutional?
Next by thread: Re: Are Border Guard Checkpoints Constitutional?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Relevant Pages

Re: Are Border Guard Checkpoints Constitutional?
... 10 mile frontier of exclusive Federal jurisdiction on the USMexico ... border. ... This might require a Constitutional amendment though. ... UNITED States don't they understand? ...
(misc.survivalism)
Re: Are Border Guard Checkpoints Constitutional?
... 10 mile frontier of exclusive Federal jurisdiction on the USMexico ... We need a MUCH bigger and stronger Federal Government! ... UNITED States don't they understand? ...
(misc.survivalism)