Forced into a government camp?

How may people here feel that being forced into a government camp is a
realistic risk, given something like the following scenario?

1. An unprecedented series of natural disasters strike your entire
region, e.g., several category 5 hurricanes or several 7+ Richter Scale
earthquakes.

2. A series of terrorist attacks with dirty bombs, chemical releases, or
the like strike cities all over your region.

Assume that the remainder of the country is not directly affected and
the governments in Washington, D.C. and your state Capitol are up and
running more or less normally.

Further assume your general part of town is not at risk from any
chemical, radiological or other looming threat requiring emergency mass
evacuation but is generally just damaged and without water, power, etc.
You, however, have your supplies and simply prefer to stay at home, or
plan to pack up and evacuate to your pre-planned location outside the
disaster area or your own.

Do you suppose you will be required to relocate to a government refugee
camp and not be allowed to leave, or be prevented from leaving the area
by foot, bike car a whatever, on you own?

Jeff

.