Re: 5 Billion per nuc power plant... we can build 100 of em..
- From: "J. Carroll" <not@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2007 06:22:33 GMT
phil scott wrote:
On Nov 29, 9:44 pm, Tim May <timc...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
In article
<16d072a7-5b7d-4ce3-a897-49a95d612...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
phil scott <p...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Your physics and math are deeply flawed. While PV may someday be all
that you claim it can be, it is not that now:
I dont claim much for PV at all.... the other poster was referring to
another NON PV solar install in the desert that would be much more
effective... parabolic reflectors is my guess.
http://www.pge.com/news/news_releases/q3_2007/070725a.html
This isn't very informative but it is instructive.
The joint PG&E/ SDGE project is the full scale installation and at two
"parks". The press release involves PG&E's commitment to purchase a portion
of the output from Mojave.
--
John R. Carroll
www.machiningsolution.com
.
- References:
- 5 Billion per nuc power plant... we can build 100 of em..
- From: phil scott
- Re: 5 Billion per nuc power plant... we can build 100 of em..
- From: Li RM
- Re: 5 Billion per nuc power plant... we can build 100 of em..
- From: phil scott
- Re: 5 Billion per nuc power plant... we can build 100 of em..
- From: Tim May
- Re: 5 Billion per nuc power plant... we can build 100 of em..
- From: phil scott
- 5 Billion per nuc power plant... we can build 100 of em..
- Prev by Date: Re: 5 Billion per nuc power plant... we can build 100 of em..
- Next by Date: Re: 5 Billion per nuc power plant... we can build 100 of em..
- Previous by thread: Re: 5 Billion per nuc power plant... we can build 100 of em..
- Next by thread: Re: 5 Billion per nuc power plant... we can build 100 of em..
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|