Re: Are Bush Or Cheney Next?
- From: hot-ham-and-cheese@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 04 Nov 2007 06:37:23 -0800
On Nov 3, 11:51 pm, Winston_Smith <not_r...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sat, 03 Nov 2007 20:07:39 -0700, hot-ham-and-che...@xxxxxxxxxxx
wrote:
On Nov 3, 3:08 pm, Winston_Smith <not_r...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sat, 03 Nov 2007 07:31:34 -0700, hot-ham-and-che...@xxxxxxxxxxx
wrote:
On Nov 3, 11:04 am, Winston_Smith <not_r...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Constant would be good in a world leader.
World leader? He's the President of the USA, not some UN weanie.
Want to see Governor Bush
debate President Bush on national policy issues?
<http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=bush.v.bush_DAILYSHOW.mov&btnG=G...>
Yes his priorities changed.
First he wanted to sell the War on Terror so he needed a bad guy to
personalize the evil.
It wasn't a hard sell. I think the WTC and Pentagon was sufficient.
What do you think?
Gee, I thought he wanted the attacks. You know - galvanizing event,
classified security memo titles that he ignored, reports of students
that wanted to learn to fly but didn't care about landing, that he
ignored, candidate Bush wanting a nice litle war.
Your words mark you as a kook, not my merely saying such.
In any case 9-11 was the mandate to get Osama bin Forgotten in
Afghanistan. Not word one about Iraq. Nor Iran.
And now the sheeples are starting to figure out it's going to cost us
our country. The Brits and most others have already bailed. The
brain dead 29% are the only ones hanging in.
Kook.
BS snipped.
--------------
Then it turned out that he couldn't catch him - gave up is best chance
to shift specialist troops to start up Iran - so he said
Iran? You think Osama is in Iran?
--------------
Snip of Winton being a kook has been restored.
2. Blow jobs from willing adult females was bad, now blow jobs are
OK, even from coerced underage male pages.
You'll have to ask Barnie Frank about that.
No, I was asking your alternate personality, LiRM, since he wrote:
I would hope that LiRM would know very little about that, but knock
yourself out.
Please tell your other foot to answer. It seems awfully quiet after
his first salvo. Foot in mouth probably.
I've no idea what you're talking about, kook.
The real expert on the subject matter is Barney Frank.
My how you do try to change to subject.
You wanted answers. I pointed you to the subject matter expert.
Was Frank in the stall with Craig? That could explain the need for a
wide stance.
As I understand it, Frank has been in many stalls.
Please note, that's called a direct question ending in a question
mark.
snip BS nonsense and grammar complaints.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
--------------
(Of course, you snipped that and the tag team handed off responding so
they can ignore what they said.)
Of course I didn't. If you'll look up-thread, you'll see it in my
reply. So why did you snip it and then accuse me of doing so?
Do you always manufacture injuries, or have you ever had an actual
injury?
--------------
Winston's snippage of his lies restored.
Winston, there are three (3) questions and question marks (?) above
that you snipped and which I've restored.
Kindly answer why you make snips, then claim I made the snips and have
somehow injured you, then snip my rebuttals.
Thanks.
.
- References:
- Are Bush Or Cheney Next?
- From: Too_Many_Tools
- Re: Are Bush Or Cheney Next?
- From: Li RM
- Re: Are Bush Or Cheney Next?
- From: hot-ham-and-cheese
- Re: Are Bush Or Cheney Next?
- From: hot-ham-and-cheese
- Re: Are Bush Or Cheney Next?
- From: hot-ham-and-cheese
- Are Bush Or Cheney Next?
- Prev by Date: Re: Are Bush Or Cheney Next?
- Next by Date: Re: The money pump
- Previous by thread: Re: Are Bush Or Cheney Next?
- Next by thread: Re: Are Bush Or Cheney Next?
- Index(es):
Loading