Re: done it1

On Oct 30, 10:07 pm, Dan <dnada...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
hot-ham-and-che...@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
On Oct 30, 3:09 am, Dan <dnada...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
That's because you read Runner, Stuey, LiRM, and that lot.

Actually, you're wrong again. I read very little of Gunner, and Stew,
and perhaps a little more of LiRM. I find most of my time is spent
reading TMT, Winton, Brock, Myal, and Bugleman. and you.

Then you will have noticed, if you can read critically,

I do read critically, and respond so.

that each of us
is quite distinct. Our background knowledge, current knowledge, sources
of information, information presented, writing styles, and subjects of
interest are quite different, though, to be sure, there is some amount
of overlap.

I haven't noticed homo-erotic fantasy coming from your keyboard.
Perhaps there are some differences that were previously overlooked.

Well, no, I'm being quite honest when I note that your sources are
pretty much single point, though it may be true that each of you
individually gets the same information from a different place.

Well, you are being dishonest again.

Well, no, I'm not.

More denial.

It is your lack of reading skills that hurt you so
much in topic after topic, and this is just one more reminder of that.

What were you saying about repeating a lie? Worked for Hitler?

The truth doesn't need to be
manufactured. As a matter of fact, the truth cannot be manufactured.

On that we can agree, then. See, there is even overlap between you and me!

Wow. We have a lot in common.

Some would even say that it is self-evident.

Perhaps, but they would be hopelessly naive. Now, perhaps, SOME truths
might be so-described, but hardly "truth." Were that the case, we'd all
be the same religion, and fake religious politicians wouldn't be asking
that Creationism be taught in the science curriculum of ANY school, let
alone public schools...

Yet other religious beliefs can be taught in schools, just not
Christianity...

Maybe that's how conservatives seem to arrive at the same point.

Hardly, for a variety of reasons, foremost of which is that I am far
more conservative than any of the people I name above, and I hardly
arrive at the same point you do. Then again, I use actual facts to
arrive at my conclusions...

So you are saying that you are smarter than Brock, TMT, Winston, Myal,
Bugleman,...?

Well, we do sometimes pat each other on the back,

Sometimes, huh? Sheesh!

Perhaps a percent or two of our combined posts. Much less than the
group above (which, since you do not read them, you have no basis to
comment upon that observation).

Prove it.

In the future I'll use the key word, "SLAPFEST." Be sure to keep an
eye out for it.

I'll use it as a term to mean "what follows and/or precedes is nonsense."

Of course you will. That is what you do - twist the truth to mean
something else.

but in a
congratulatory way for coming up with something witty and/or original,
quite distinct from your group behavior, which is to repeat, almost
verbatim, what has already been said.

It bears repeating.

Usually, it was nonsense the first time, and the hundredth time. The
NeoRepublican method is to repeat endlessly until the meme becomes
indistinguishable form truth. Worked for Hitler - it is hardly
original, but they certainly have polished it to a bright shiny finish.
Intelligent people, and those trained in rhetorical and advertising
techniques are hardly fooled, but the ornery citizens seem to go for it...

...for a while.

There you go thinking you are smarter than every one else. For such a
smart "conservative" as you claim to be, do you understand that you
are being manipulated by the left?

Yawn. See. Repetition, no original thought, adding nothing...

I'm merely encouraging you to success. I apologize that I'm no Zig
Ziggler.

I'm quite successful, thank you very much.

You are successful at buying into the moveon.org propaganda.

I'm not the one endlessly
and mindlessly repeating propaganda slogans...

You are mistaken again.

Glad we can agree on something. Signed up for a reading comprehension
course?

The Nuns did a pretty good job of it.

Obviously they spared the ruler a bit too much with you.

Not all Nuns follow the Sister Mary Elephant method, but you only know
what you are told.

I'm satisfied.

So is the hog being led to slaughter.

That may be something you have knowledge of.

You made a false assertion. I called you on it. YOU back it up...
Don't worry, since you cannot, I only expect much more of this same
deflection behavior.
So answer the question.
Ding, ding, ding. We have a winner!

You SURE you are not Runner?

More deflection? I thought you wanted to get back on-topic?

And when I attempted to do so, all I got was more disdirection from you.

Yes, "disdirection."

Now, you made several statements that were false. Either retract or
attempt a defense, but quit stalling.

No.

And all this mindless referencing of the mythical "Bobs" is just making
you look silly. Autodelete mode on.

I hope you're able to do it better than The Bob.

Now about that habeas corpus thingie...

What about it?

Well, he IS your resident...

Really?

Dole passed legislation which allowed a single
individual or entity to own ALL media outlets in any media market.
Very unhealthy.

And Bob Dole is from WHICH political Party?

Republican.

Take your time, it is
obviously a trick question for you.

How so?

And WHICH political Party OWNS the
vast majority (there's that word again) of the supposed "public
interest" mainstream media?

No political party owns the mainstream media. Most of the employees
are left-leaning in philospophy, and in what they write.

Of course, "vast" incorporates financial clout as well as sheer numbers.

So how "vast" would that make Soros?

Not very, since he hasn't been heard from since 2004... And he is just
one single person!

You say that ""vast" incorporates financial clout" yet it excludes
Soros because he is one person.

So, your definition of the term "vast" is "at least one?" That explains
a lot.

You said, "Of course, "vast" incorporates financial clout as well as
sheer numbers."

Are you now saying that Soros has no financial clout?

Back-pedalling noted.

Nary a backpedal in the post. Do try to keep up (learn to read).

That's an outright lie.

But then, you wouldn't know that, would you, since your "news" sources
aren't so much news as propaganda.

Propaganda indeed. I watch mostly mainstream stuff like CNN, BBC, and
listen to Air NPR.

Yet you ignore all the facts and keep spouting nonsense. Maybe it isn't
only a reading comprehension problem...

What would you suggest? Do I need to listen to Alex Jones? Al
Franken?

Again, he can defend himself.

A pacifist defend himself? Best of Luck.

He accomplishes the feat far better than you can even dream of...

That is not evidenced on misc.survivalism. Perhaps he participates in
WWF where I do no watching.

Comprehension failure noted.

Kindly point me to an occurrance of Winston successfully defending
himself. Thanks.

Once again you make foolish statements. Habits are hard to break.
You should be quite knowledgeable on that one.
I do! I've bitten my fingernails since childhood, and don't ever
envision a time when I will stop.

Do you still wet your bed?

Do you still beat your wife?

But at least I am not foolish.

Others see you much different than you see yourself.

Well, the only ones to claim I am foolish are spouting demonstrable
nonsense, so their opinion is hardly a problem for me.

That you disagree doesn't make it nonsense.

Think "people that want America to soak up terrorist attacks."
I don't know any of those, on the right or the left,
Sure you do. But you choose to believe otherwise.
Well, I was giving you and Runner and Stuey and LiRM a chance to skulk
off... You should have taken the offer.

Appeasement?

You don't even know when you've been insulted. It's no fun having a
battle of wits against an unarmed person...

Must I acknowledge that you've attempted to insult me? Why must I
give you that satisfaction?

Your soul must be very thin to need such things.

Consider two American Embassy bombings in Africa, the person who
planned them, and the person who refused Ethiopa's offers to hand him
over to America.
Nope, can't think of anyone that fits that description. Oh wait, did
you mean around Tora Bora, where a certain world leader called off the
chase for reasons as yet not made public? A genuine documented case of
letting a certain known terrorist off the hook? That guy?

Or are you talking VRWC fantasies that have no basis in fact?

You are definitely into denial and diversion.

Well denial, as in denying falsehood, is a perfectly legitimate
technique, especially when accompanied with counter-examples.

Do counter-examples make my examples false? No. Why did your hero
let your other hero go?

Perhaps you should stop gainsaying everything those more educated than
you say and actually take the responsibility to become educated
yourself. Then you won't look so silly.

I just don't alarm when you think I'm silly. Try something else.

though there is
some evidence that NeoCons and other Republicans have more tolerance of
that (witness the lack of any coordinated plan to stop same) than do us
liberals and other thinkers.
Please don't use the claim of "thinkers" in the same sentence with
"liberals." Thanks.
Us liberals can think circles around you NeoCon types, any day, any place.

You are good schemers, having to get around the truth somehow.

That would be "Republicans." At least for the last 50 some years.

Odd. I recall the same being said of Democrats for quite some time
now.

You mean you don't want me to tell the truth? Typical NeoCon...

I'd love to see you tell the truth. You can start any time.

Reding comprehension failures noted.

I understand what you are trying to say, yet repeating a falsehood has
no effect on me.

Think "pennance."
You got me on that one. What does that statement even mean?
Liberal guilt?
Nope, still doesn't register.

Denial.

Aardvark.

Dodo.

Think "appeasing pacifists."
Well, the only ones appeasing Osama Bin Laden are Republicans (Resident
Bush being appeaser-in-chief). The only ones hampering international
efforts to track down terrorists are in the current administration
(though, to be sure, the Democrats aren't putting up much of a fight).
The only ones to yell at the Turks for attempting to track down
terrorists are, you guessed it, George Bush and his clan...
As Brock likes to claim, Osama will turn up when we need him to most.
Yes?
I really don't know. Do you?

Brock seems to know all.

Not the Brock I have been reading.

Perhaps you have a "reding" problem.

Good luck with the reading program. You have no where to go but up.
Dan
My reading is just fine. At least it's fine enough to catch you in
your lies.
Current score:

Dan: + infinity
HHaC: 0 (zero)

Not too proud...

Dan

Wishful thinking, huh?

Damn, caught me...

Numerous times...

I admit it, that "infinity" part was certainly
hyperbole, since I have only been alive for a short time, and have only
made a finite number of statements over that lifetime...

Dan

You admit to lying. Welp, that's a start.


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: done it1
    ... It is your lack of reading skills that hurt you so much in topic after topic, and this is just one more reminder of that. ... the truth cannot be manufactured. ... liberals and other thinkers. ... As Brock likes to claim, Osama will turn up when we need him to most. ...
    (misc.survivalism)
  • Re: Bally Nonsense!
    ... Your learning doesn't show. ... reading some of the nonsense you post. ... All truth passes through three stages: ...
    (uk.environment.conservation)
  • Re: Socrates and the Liar
    ... The truth of a statement that asserts the truth of another statement ... of reading do not inform an act of reading even if they facilitate it. ...
    (sci.logic)
  • Re: Civility
    ... An opinion, absent an underlying basis in truth, is ... those reading here that take a glee in such a description--even though they ... knowledge base when one side of the conversation is an assertion made up out ... of whole lies, and then the entire ensuing repartee is spent in: ...
    (rec.outdoors.rv-travel)
  • Re: "Theatre of God"
    ... emotional high one gets from exciting theater, special effects and loud, ... of the truth of what one's reading or thinking about. ... An audience may or may not be a congregation. ...
    (uk.religion.christian)
Loading