Re: Al Qaeda Torture

On Thu, 26 Jul 2007 22:15:29 -0400, Li RM wrote:

On Thu, 26 Jul 2007 23:34:20 +0000 (UTC), EskWIRED@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
wrote:

In misc.survivalism, Li RM <Li_RM@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Thu, 26 Jul 2007 13:14:01 +0000 (UTC), EskWIRED@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
wrote:

In misc.survivalism, Li RM <Li_RM@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

You know bin Laden said back in November of '04 that if we just vote
"blue", everything will be OK and he won't attack us anymore,
remember.

You are so full of *** it flows out of your fingertips.

Blow it out your ass:

http://www.worldpress.org/Americas/1964.cfm

Excerpt of bin Laden's speech to the American People on October 30th,
2004:

"And know that: "It is better to return to the truth than persist in
error." And that the wise man doesn't squander his security, wealth
and children for the sake of the liar in the White House.

This is anti-Bush. But it says NOTHING like what you claimed.


In conclusion, I tell you in truth, that your security is not in the
hands of Kerry, nor Bush, nor al-Qaida. No.

Your security is in your own hands. And every state that doesn't play
with our security has automatically guaranteed its own security."

This is anti-Bush. But it says NOTHING like what you claimed.



--------- end excerpt

In other words, vote "blue" and vote Bush out of office and you'll be
guaranteeing your state's safety.


"in other words" he didn't say nothing of the sort.

Apparently, I'm not the only person who thinks so (including - imagine
that - the Islamist web site Al-Qal'a):

Your sharing of fantasies with al quaeda is irrelevant to what he said.


http://frankwarner.typepad.com/free_frank_warner/2004/11/islamist_web_si.html


"The events that affected my soul in a direct way started in 1982 when
America permitted the Israelis to invade Lebanon and the American
Sixth Fleet helped them in that. This bombardment began and many were
killed and injured and others were terrorised and displaced...

This says nothing like what you claimed.


...And as I looked at those demolished towers in Lebanon, it entered
my mind that we should punish the oppressor in kind and that we should
destroy towers in America in order that they taste some of what we
tasted and so that they be deterred from killing our women and
children...

This says nothing like what you claimed.



...And for the record, we had agreed with the Commander-General
Muhammad Ataa, Allah have mercy on him, that all the operations should
be carried out within 20 minutes, before Bush and his administration
notice..."


This says nothing like what you claimed.

Awww.

That was really cute how you conveniently deleted the cites to many
others who read that portion of the speech exactly the way I did.

As if no one would notice.

Especially after asking me for them in another message thread on the
exact same topic.

That's what I call showing some real balls, ESK.

I think I'll just toss 'em back in here for the record:

http://www.freemuslims.org/news/article.php?article=202

http://memri.org/bin/articles.cgi?Page=archives&Area=sd&ID=SP80904

http://www.jihadwatch.org/archives/003746.php

http://www.weeklystandard.com/Content/Public/Articles/000/000/004/860zmsuq.asp

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=41211

http://billhobbs.com/hobbsonline/004798.html

http://frankwarner.typepad.com/free_frank_warner/2004/11/islamist_web_si.html

Editing out what you don't want to address in a response - especially
editing out specifically what you've asked someone to include is the
sign of a truly weak argument.

Or a weak mind.

Take your pick.

You noticed that Eski's second tact, when you confronted him with proof he
was ignorant and tried to educate him/her/it, is to shove his head up
his/her/it's ass and pretend to not understand.

Stupidity works for liberals. It's because they don't give a rats ass
about the truth; they have a hidden agenda.
.