Re: Another Bush lie
- From: Stuart Grey <stuart.grey@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2007 22:44:52 -0500
On Tue, 19 Jun 2007 20:15:51 -0700, J Carroll wrote:
Stuart Grey wrote:
On Tue, 19 Jun 2007 19:39:23 -0700, Winston_Smith wrote:
On Sun, 17 Jun 2007 21:01:41 -0500, Stuart Grey
<stuart.grey@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sun, 17 Jun 2007 08:32:26 -0700, Winston_Smith wrote:
On Sun, 17 Jun 2007 02:08:00 -0500, Stuart Grey
<stuart.grey@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
And yet, we found the "fictional" wmd.
Oh? Cites please.
Not some traces of decades old serin gas that we arranged for him
so he could fight the Iranians, please.
We need bio labs (mobile ones would be especially nice), nuclear
anythings, significant ICBMs. After all, Chaney was talking about
"mushroom clouds" over American cites "within months".
Winston, UN SC resolution 681 was passed in 1991. Why the *** are
you so utterly STUPID to think that resolution was about WMD
manufactured AFTER 1991?
Oh, OK. I see. No cites that WE found some. Just some resolution
before the fact saying maybe, just maybe ... if. By the way, was
that passed before of after Powell went there and lied to them?
Oh hell! I give a url to a pdf file from the Director of National
Intelligence to the House Select committee on Intelligence saying
"Since 2003 Coalition forces have recovered approximately 500 weapons
munitions which contain degraded mustard or sarin nerve agent", and
you say "no cites that we found some".
Ah, Stuart?
Degraded mustard gas is about as harmful as "mustard" dude.
Even if, irrelevant. These are the WMD that UN Res 1441 said there would
be serious consequences to Iraq if Iraq didn't hand them over.
Further, "degraded" does not mean inactive. You are again lying. They are
far more dangerous than mustard. The danger and significance of degraded
mustard gas is the build up of hydrogen gas within the warhead.
http://www.rsc.org/chemistryworld/Issues/2004/March/weapons.asp
They are not inert. That is a lie that you pulled from your ass. The U.S.
Army has keep Mustard gas for half a century.
You wouldn't brush your teeth with the stuff but you have things inyour
kitchen that pose a greater risk to your health. Shall we see if goober
bush wants to have the Army visit your home?
If you didn't lie, I suppose you wouldn't post.
.
- References:
- Re: Another Bush lie
- From: Stuart Grey
- Re: Another Bush lie
- From: Stuart Grey
- Re: Another Bush lie
- From: Stuart Grey
- Re: Another Bush lie
- From: J Carroll
- Re: Another Bush lie
- Prev by Date: Re: Another Bush lie
- Next by Date: Re: Another Bush lie
- Previous by thread: Re: Another Bush lie
- Next by thread: Re: Another Bush lie
- Index(es):
Loading