Re: Two alternative GPS systems in the works



On Tue, 10 Apr 2007 22:28:22 -0700, Winston_Smith
<bogus@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Mon, 09 Apr 2007 23:13:26 -0500, Lawrence Glickman
<Lawrence_Glickman@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Mon, 09 Apr 2007 20:35:13 -0700, Winston_Smith
<bogus@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20070409/ts_nm/russia_usa_gps_dc
Russia plans to rival U.S. GPS system

Winston,

Right now I have an armada of gps receivers that work with the US DoD
satellites. Will I have to buy entirely new equipment for the
gallelio and glonass systems? Or will there be a receiver that
integrates =all= available signals into one unit? How is this going
to work. I'm interested as I have a considerable investment in the US
equipment.

Lg

I think the US system will keep on being used and your equipment will
receive it as usual. After all, it's basically there for the military
and there are huge transportation industry investments in it.

The new systems have to be different in some way or they would
interfere with each other. I'm sure new receivers will come on the
market to receive them. One, two or all three.

It will be the consumers choice in the future which one you want to go
with very much the way you choose one cell phone provider and not
another or one satellite TV system over their competitor.

Not to fear, what you have should keep on keepin' on.

This is a big relief. Thank you Winston, and Terryc.
As a sidenote, the US gps system is subject to radio interference from
solar storms. Unfortunately, during a solar storm, the same radio
frequency spectrum the gps receivers in the US use are overlap the
radio interference from the solar flareup. This can and has in the
past, resulted in communications interruptions and in the case of gps,
denial of service.

The next solar activity of this kind is expected around 2011 or 2012.
Some solutions have been suggested, like making the satellite signals
stronger, but that would mean a new fleet of enormously expensive
hardware. Time will tell what happens.

Lg

.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Solar storms spell trouble for GPS
    ... Solar storms spell trouble for GPS ... Because GPS receivers only became common ... the government decided we needed to keep a non satellite based backup ...
    (rec.aviation.piloting)
  • Re: NEW GPS with the best sensitivity of antenna!!!
    ... > I have head that under tree cover after rain GPS doesn't work. ... the geometry of the satellites being used with respect to receiver ... diffraction, ans scattering of the satellite signal by trees, utility ... Satellite clock--Errors in the transmitted clock, ...
    (sci.geo.satellite-nav)
  • Re: The physics of music.
    ... changing synchronization corrections for each clock exist such that the ... that the GPS continues to operate with great accuracy has in fact ... relativity in the global positioning system, ... The design life of each satellite is 7.5 years.) ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: GPS Tip: Why does a GPS need to know where it is before it can compute where it is?
    ... This does seem strange but for the quickest fix a GPS depends on knowing the approximate location and the current time. ... This is due to the fact that the satellites are all broadcasting on the same frequency and in order to lock on to a particular one it uses knowledge of the current satellite locations in the sky and orbit data to provide a lock. ... Note that after the fix is calculated the GPS will use the Doppler data to calculate the current velocity. ... Almanac data is used by GPS receiver to assign PRN codes to ...
    (sci.geo.satellite-nav)
  • Re: The Speed of Gravity =?windows-1252?Q?=96_What_the_Exp?= =?windows-1252?Q?eriments_Say?=
    ... continually changing synchronization corrections for each clock exist such that the predictions of SR are fulfilled for any local co-moving frame. ... To avoid the embarrassment of that complexity, GPS analysis is now done exclusively in the Earth-centered inertial frame. ... And the pre-launch adjustment of clock rates to compensate for relativistic effects then hides the fact that all orbiting satellite clocks would be seen to tick slower than ground clocks if not rate-compensated for their orbital motion, and that no reciprocity would exist when satellites view ground clocks. ... Now, if one can provide a way for a ground receiver to synchronize its clock with the satellite clock, a simple measurement of the time delay in the signal received from a satellite in view of the Earthbound user, should result in a precise range to that satellite. ...
    (sci.physics)