Re: Require English/Civics of Legans & Illegals
- From: Sue <sebrady@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 14:02:10 GMT
On Wed, 10 May 2006 08:24:24 GMT, zadoc <zadoc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mon, 08 May 2006 23:50:20 GMT, "Jeff McCann"
<NoSpam@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
<0PQ7g.300$Jf.13@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> :
|>I'm juumping into the thread late, but:
|>
|>Why don't we require civics education and English fluency for all Americans?
|>You only need spend a little time on the infobahn to realize how shockingly
|>ignorant many Americans are about their own system of government, and how
|>poorly many of us do in composition and comprehension, even by the casual
|>standards of the internet.
|>
|>One effect of "No Child Left Behind" and other attempts at educational
|>reform is that civics and history, as well as art, etc., are given short
|>shrift because these subjects aren't tested to measure the schools'
|>performance. But we ignore them at our peril. We need to train our young
|>to be citizens of our Republic, not just conformist worker drones.
|>
|>I have to wonder how the average American high school graduate would do on
|>test given to prospective naturalized citizens. I'd guess they wouldn't do
|>too well.
|>
|>Jeff
|>
This is very true, Jeff, but would it be practical to enforce.
We all know that age is not necessarily related to competence to
do anything. Yet we set "age limits" for "sexual consent",
"issuance of a drivers license", "legal drinking age" "legal
military service age" "legal voting age", and so on.
Now, of course, basing any of the above on age alone is obviously
only valid if all humans are equal & identical. I would argue
that no two humans are absolutely identical in any parameter you
want to specify.
There are probably bright twelve year olds who are more
"competent" "intelligent", " knowledgeable" "trustable", or
more "educated" than their parents or grandparents.
However, how do we test all this? Imagine the legal morass we
would get into if we allowed a 12 year old a drivers license, but
not a 35 year old.
Or for even something more "touchy" some sort of a literacy or
intelligence test for voters?
Even a very simple test, with questions such "here is a blank map
of the world, which country are you in? Here is an unlabeled
map of the US. Point out your state."
"The sun is bigger or smaller than the earth. The moon is bigger
or smaller than the earth."
"What is the approximate speed of light or electricity?"
"What is the square root of 9"
"Are there kangaroos in Austraia"?
Kangaroos? Who know? I don't believe I could even find "Austraia" on
the map. :o)
Sue
"Is it a federal offense in the US to steal coins from a public
phone"?
Make up any questions you like, but it wouldn't take a very
difficult set to eliminate a large percentage of the present
voting [or driving] population. :-)
Posting from misc.survivalism
Cheers,
Zadoc
zadoc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
.
- Prev by Date: Site Update - The House Cow
- Next by Date: Re: Fatal Contact - The Critique
- Previous by thread: Re: Require English/Civics of Legans & Illegals
- Next by thread: Re: Require English/Civics of Legans & Illegals
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|