Re: Heads Up

On Sun, 15 Jan 2006 02:53:31 -0600, Lawrence Glickman
<Lawrence_Glickman@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>On Sun, 15 Jan 2006 18:47:00 +1100, "Sheerluck"
><sheerluck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>>
>>"Lawrence Glickman" <Lawrence_Glickman@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>>news:6cgjs1924ick8mcadbsimeohbqpcalagqt@xxxxxxxxxx
>>> On Sat, 14 Jan 2006 19:14:32 -0800, "Jon Danniken"
>>> <jonREMOVETHISdanniken@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>> >"Winston Smith"
>>> >> Cue the gal who sings "I'll be seeing you" over the end of Dr.
>>> >> Stangelove.
>>> >
>>> >Actually that song is "We'll Meet Again" by Vera Lynn. I'm listening to
>>it
>>> >right now.
>>> >
>>> >Jon
>>>
>>> I volunteer to ride the 1st "BIG ONE" down to the ground ;-|
>>> Yes, I know it isn't the *survivalist* thing to do, but I can scream
>>> YAHOOOOOOOO! just as well as Andy Devine.
>>>
>>> Lg
>>>
>>LMAO!!!
>>Seriously , while I'm quite sure that this year will be remembered as the
>>first time nukes have been used since the Hiroshima/Nagasaki urban renewal
>>program , there's not much chance of it leading to a full-scale
>>confrontation between the nuclear powers .
>>I'm guessing that Israel will do what it has to , while everyone else makes
>>disapproving noises in public while privately cheering them on .
>>As was suggested on a previous thread , the fallout from a local , tactical
>>series of strikes will be minimal .
>>Sheerluck
>
>You know, the *wild card* in this is Pakistan, IMO. They have divided
>loyalties, and might feel compelled to join into the foray. That
>would give India the chance it has been waiting for ( they are mortal
>enemies with Pakistan ), and things could get rolling from there. In
>which case, Syria might feel compelled to become involved in some way,
>and then whomever else has a *grudge* south of the equator.
>
>NORTH of the equator, blissful Peace will prevail. Germany, Korea,
>China, Russia, USA, England, France, will just turn on the VCR to
>record this slugfest south of Zero degrees longitude. What we refer
>to as the Mideast, INCLUDING Israel of course, will become quite a
>mess I am predicting. Of course, I have been wrong about these things
>before, but my errors are mostly in reference to WHEN not IF.
>
>I predicted a _divided_ Jerusalem. Years ago. I was scoffed at.
>Because neither the Israelis nor the Palestinians will settle for
>that; they each want the entire pie for themselves. Well...time
>changes things a little bit. They might cut the baby in two, and hand
>1/2 to the pallies, and 1/2 to Israel, before or after the mushroom
>clouds dissipate.
>
>My guess is nuclear will be used on the underground facilities I have
>posted links to, because there is nothing we have in the way of
>conventional bunker busters that can go that deep through that much
>reinforced concrete, and have enough *guts* left over to incinerate
>the large complexes. Tactical Nuclear Weapons at first. Maybe
>followed by Strategic Nuclear Weapons shortly thereafter...measure
>either in minutes, hours, or days.
>
>My Strategy is to make the first strike count, because whomever throws
>the first punch may not get a chance to throw a second one.
>
>Lg


If...if...the Israelis use the bomb...all bets are off on the status
of the Palistinians. They have been playing nice with the
Pals..largely because of the choke collar on them belonging to the US.
If they go ahead and nuke Iran...the collar will have been
removed..and its quite possible Israel will decide that Rome Plows and
bulldozers are the Final Solution to the Palistinian Problem..and
Israel will bulldoze them into the sea. Or rather..run them clear out
of the area. After all..it will have been demonstrated that they are
deadly serious..and have the nads and the means to pretty much call
the shots. Bitch about it..and they have more nukes.

You want to be a Hamas leader and be begging for financial aid from
neighboring countries..all who are standing there with their mouths
agape..watching the mushroom clouds rising above what used to be some
fair sized chunks of Iran? Israel would simply say..keep it up..and
your next.

God but they would hate Israel...but they would be stone afraid of
them too, when they realize the gloves are now off.

Gunner

"Pax Americana is a philosophy. Hardly an empire.
Making sure other people play nice and dont kill each other (and us)
off in job lots is hardly empire building, particularly when you give
them self determination under "play nice" rules.

Think of it as having your older brother knock the *** out of you
for torturing the cat." Gunner
.

Loading