Re: Heads Up

On Sun, 15 Jan 2006 02:53:31 -0600, Lawrence Glickman
<Lawrence_Glickman@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>On Sun, 15 Jan 2006 18:47:00 +1100, "Sheerluck"
><sheerluck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>>
>>"Lawrence Glickman" <Lawrence_Glickman@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>>news:6cgjs1924ick8mcadbsimeohbqpcalagqt@xxxxxxxxxx
>>> On Sat, 14 Jan 2006 19:14:32 -0800, "Jon Danniken"
>>> <jonREMOVETHISdanniken@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>> >"Winston Smith"
>>> >> Cue the gal who sings "I'll be seeing you" over the end of Dr.
>>> >> Stangelove.
>>> >
>>> >Actually that song is "We'll Meet Again" by Vera Lynn. I'm listening to
>>it
>>> >right now.
>>> >
>>> >Jon
>>>
>>> I volunteer to ride the 1st "BIG ONE" down to the ground ;-|
>>> Yes, I know it isn't the *survivalist* thing to do, but I can scream
>>> YAHOOOOOOOO! just as well as Andy Devine.
>>>
>>> Lg
>>>
>>LMAO!!!
>>Seriously , while I'm quite sure that this year will be remembered as the
>>first time nukes have been used since the Hiroshima/Nagasaki urban renewal
>>program , there's not much chance of it leading to a full-scale
>>confrontation between the nuclear powers .
>>I'm guessing that Israel will do what it has to , while everyone else makes
>>disapproving noises in public while privately cheering them on .
>>As was suggested on a previous thread , the fallout from a local , tactical
>>series of strikes will be minimal .
>>Sheerluck
>
>You know, the *wild card* in this is Pakistan, IMO. They have divided
>loyalties, and might feel compelled to join into the foray. That
>would give India the chance it has been waiting for ( they are mortal
>enemies with Pakistan ), and things could get rolling from there. In
>which case, Syria might feel compelled to become involved in some way,
>and then whomever else has a *grudge* south of the equator.
>
>NORTH of the equator, blissful Peace will prevail. Germany, Korea,
>China, Russia, USA, England, France, will just turn on the VCR to
>record this slugfest south of Zero degrees lattitude. What we refer
>to as the Mideast, INCLUDING Israel of course, will become quite a
>mess I am predicting. Of course, I have been wrong about these things
>before, but my errors are mostly in reference to WHEN not IF.
>
>I predicted a _divided_ Jerusalem. Years ago. I was scoffed at.
>Because neither the Israelis nor the Palestinians will settle for
>that; they each want the entire pie for themselves. Well...time
>changes things a little bit. They might cut the baby in two, and hand
>1/2 to the pallies, and 1/2 to Israel, before or after the mushroom
>clouds dissipate.
>
>My guess is nuclear will be used on the underground facilities I have
>posted links to, because there is nothing we have in the way of
>conventional bunker busters that can go that deep through that much
>reinforced concrete, and have enough *guts* left over to incinerate
>the large complexes. Tactical Nuclear Weapons at first. Maybe
>followed by Strategic Nuclear Weapons shortly thereafter...measure
>either in minutes, hours, or days.
>
>My Strategy is to make the first strike count, because whomever throws
>the first punch may not get a chance to throw a second one.
>
>Lg

.

Relevant Pages
Loading