Re: Bird Flu and this newsgroup

On Mon, 28 Nov 2005 23:26:40 -0500, Strider <strider@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

>On 28 Nov 2005 20:17:42 -0800, "Frank White" <fwhite@xxxxxxxxxx>
>wrote:
>
>>I find it somewhat funny that, even as we are facing a genuine
>>potential disaster, a possible pandemic that might kill millions and
>>disrupt society - the very sort of thing many of us have worried about
>>- almost all of the posts on this newsgroup are about politics, and
>>racism, and general raving lunacy. A lot of this is due to
>>cross-posting trolls, of course. And speculation about what might
>>happen and plans to deal with it are being discussed elsewhere, like at
>>CurEvents and Flu Wiki and BirdFluDefense. But still, you'd think the
>>folks here would be like kids at Christmas over the possiblity that
>>survivalism is about to become THE only reasonable lifestyle...
>>
>>Oh well. :(
>>
>>FW
>
>In case you haven't noticed, this news group is as useless as teats on
>a boar hog.
>
>Some still monitor it, but it is about useless.
>
>Strider

There is no survival threats on the immediate horizon. Hence there is
little "survival" activity. Those of us who have been here a
while...are long term survivalists and already have our ducks in a
row.

If a newbie wanted info..he wouild be unindated with it. But no one
asks. This means to me..that currently there is little or no outside
interest in the subject.
This may be the result of a calm geopolitical scene, and a healthy
economy.

Gunner

"Pax Americana is a philosophy. Hardly an empire.
Making sure other people play nice and dont kill each other (and us)
off in job lots is hardly empire building, particularly when you give
them self determination under "play nice" rules.

Think of it as having your older brother knock the *** out of you
for torturing the cat." Gunner
.

Quantcast