Re: Battery power television
- From: Tim May <timcmay@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 28 Sep 2005 20:38:09 -0700
In article <2clmj1djk74kegp311l2vvsgbb08d51ukq@xxxxxxx>, Lawrence
Glickman <Lawrence_Glickman@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 28 Sep 2005 19:08:38 -0700, "brotherjohn"
> <brotherjohn1948@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> >On another poster's bug-in list a battery powered tv caught my eye.
> > This is an item that I have not considered because in the past if the
> >electricity went out in my area the television stations generally are
> >not broadcasting either.
> >However, since we now have satellite this would be a nice thing to have
> >IF there is a battery powered tv that will connect to the satellite?
> >Does this exist? Anybody have one? Recommendations?
>
> You have to subscribe to the satellite service, which is going to cost
> you dollars. People who live where cable is not available use
> satellite all the time ( even where and when cable is available/ right
> here in my own neighborhood ) but it costs...plenty. Are you willing
> to spend the money on a *what if* ?
You missed the part where he said "since we now have satellite..."
(This obviously cannot refer to "since we now have the _potential_ to
have satellite," as full lower-48 coverage has existed with either
DirecTV or Dish Network for at least 8 years now.)
--Tim May
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Battery power television
- From: Lawrence Glickman
- Re: Battery power television
- References:
- Battery power television
- From: brotherjohn
- Re: Battery power television
- From: Lawrence Glickman
- Battery power television
- Prev by Date: Re: Battery power television
- Next by Date: Re: The value of even crudely-forged credentials in a disaster
- Previous by thread: Re: Battery power television
- Next by thread: Re: Battery power television
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|