Re: OT - Intelligent Design
- From: Jamie Hart <usenet@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2005 08:40:12 +0100
"Sgt. Sausage" <nobody@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
news:665fe$42f7bedd$42a1e606$18930@xxxxxxxx:
>> Jamie Hart <usenet@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>You can't prove a negative, this is another area your argument falls
>>down.
>
> What world do you live in? Of course you can
> prove a negative. I can construct two parallel lines and
> *prove* that they do NOT intersect -- alternatively, I
> can draw two non-parallel lines and *prove* that they
> are NOT parallel.
>
> You give me two triangles with differing angles, and
> I can *prove* that they are NOT similar.
>
> I can *prove* just about any negative you want me
> to prove.
>
> What you can't prove, however (and what I think you
> actually meant) is some you can't prove negative
> existance.
True, that is indeed what I meant. Thank you for clarifying.
.
- References:
- OT - Intelligent Design
- From: Stuart Grey
- Re: OT - Intelligent Design
- From: Gio Medici
- Re: OT - Intelligent Design
- From: Stuart Grey
- Re: OT - Intelligent Design
- From: Rudy Canoza
- Re: OT - Intelligent Design
- From: Stuart Grey
- Re: OT - Intelligent Design
- From: The Watcher
- Re: OT - Intelligent Design
- From: Stuart Grey
- Re: OT - Intelligent Design
- From: Jamie Hart
- Re: OT - Intelligent Design
- From: Gio Medici
- Re: OT - Intelligent Design
- From: Sgt. Sausage
- OT - Intelligent Design
- Prev by Date: Re: OT - Intelligent Design
- Next by Date: Re: Personal survival
- Previous by thread: Re: OT - Intelligent Design
- Next by thread: Re: OT - Intelligent Design
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|