Re: something the media did not want you to see

In article <13dg9au286pote9@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Rudy Canoza <pipes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

enigma wrote:
Rudy Canoza <pipes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
news:13dfc0rtnbop41b@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:

jimmie-fat-*** ledford, angry drunk peg-leg of Greater
Wendell, NC, blabbered:
Ann wrote:

jimmie-fat-*** ledford, angry drunk peg-leg of Greater
Wendell, NC, plagiarized:

Wow! Who will step up and help make this happen??
Guess our national leaders didn't expect this, hmm? On
Thursday,
------
Note: The date has been omitted; it was May 27, 1999 ...
not this Thursday.
the message was just as good on that Thursday as it
would be on any other Thursday.
What a lame excuse for plagiarism,

it was properly attributed to the author. there was no
plagarism.

It was plagiarized. There was NO attribution by
jimmie-fat-*** to anyone. With the exception of

Wow! Who will step up and help make this happen??
Guess our national leaders didn't expect this, hmm?

appended at the beginning, and "God bless" appended at
the end, the rest of it is verbatim the e-mail
pass-around content repeated at Snopes.com.
jimmie-fat-*** didn't say "I got this in an e-mail",
nor did he include a link. He didn't attribute it in
any way.

You're an idiot.

I don't agree with this whole thing. Jim did not say theses were his
words. While did not credit the text's source, I gleaned this from hi
original post:

"The following is a portion of the transcript:"

By that, I assumed the words that followed were "not" his words and he
got it from another source.

YK
.

Quantcast