Re: netiquette and freedoms (was Re: NAIS)
- From: Peter Huebner <no.one@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2006 09:20:44 +1300
In article <oqWdnQPeMMXCGULenZ2dnUVZ_s-dnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, offbreed_106
@hotmail.com says...
>
> You did not snip a bit of the post you were responding to and went off
> on a tangent. You also tried to bring chip tracking of humans and
> firearms into the thread (both problems, granted, and neither related to
> *this* problem, unless you think something can be uninvented?)
>
> Yes, the bozo bin should fit you fine. Bye.
>
Agreed. It's becoming clear that (s)he is not the least bit interested in
_reasoned_ discourse.
I just wrote up a lenthy argument, re-read what I was replying to and hit
'cancel' instead of 'send'.
-P.
--
=========================================
firstname dot lastname at gmail fullstop com
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: netiquette and freedoms (was Re: NAIS)
- From: J.C.
- Re: netiquette and freedoms (was Re: NAIS)
- References:
- NAIS
- From: J.C.
- Re: NAIS
- From: Farm1
- Re: NAIS
- From: Don Bruder
- Re: NAIS
- From: Farm1
- Re: NAIS
- From: J.C.
- netiquette and freedoms (was Re: NAIS)
- From: Sheldon Harper
- Re: netiquette and freedoms (was Re: NAIS)
- From: J.C.
- Re: netiquette and freedoms (was Re: NAIS)
- From: Offbreed
- NAIS
- Prev by Date: And the whole ball of wax.
- Next by Date: Re: netiquette and freedoms (was Re: NAIS)
- Previous by thread: Re: netiquette and freedoms (was Re: NAIS)
- Next by thread: Re: netiquette and freedoms (was Re: NAIS)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|