Re: Historic gasoline prices, 1965-1978
- From: "Christina Peterson" <tinapetrsn@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2005 10:10:23 -0800
"Strange Indeed" <strange@xxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:Xns96B73E45BBC4strangenonecom@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> "Christina Peterson" <tinapetrsn@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in
> news:43058c34@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:
>
> > You're right. Consistently there has been a problem with descriptions
> > because the engine is so different. Walter tries to use common terms
> > that people can relate to, though the function is arrived at
> > differently. And he knows all the words much better than I do. For
> > example, I don't know if "super-charged" is really the correct term
> > for using oxygen enriched air. And two cylinders are not cylinders,
> > but a single divided chamber with a fixed piston on each end.
>
> > Lots of words, and lots of parts/functions have had to be invented
> > along with the technology.
>
> > The carburetor will have a variable fuel to oxygen ration, but the
> > engine will probably still need more than one gear, especially for an
> > 18 wheeler.
>
> I took a look at the patent and it is not only odd but inconsistent. It
> starts out talking about four stroke cycle engines but further along the
> discussion is states that the engine works on a two stroke principle.
>
> Lacking a complete exhaust stroke means that an engine doesn't ever fully
> purge its exhaust gasses and efficiency suffers unavoidably. I hasten to
> add that because something is or can be described and drawn does not mean
> it will actually work. Here are some excellent examples:
>
> http://tinyurl.com/drkdy
>
> The Patent Office patents original ideas, having dispensed with requiring
> a working model of the item. So acquiring a patent only means the idea is
> original and it looks like it *might* work. Do you have a working model?
>
> It sounds as though Walter Schmied started off with ideas from a Sterling
> engine ( http://tinyurl.com/83spa ) and modified them.
>
> Best of luck with your assigned interest.
>
You know, it's been quite a while since I was at University, so my memory of
exactly how a Sterling engine works is faded. But no, this does not
resemble a Sterling. This is not a modification of any existing engine.
Actually, its motion reminds me of a Scotch Yoke, but I was scolded for
that, because of Scotch Yoke is complex and inefficient and this is simple.
I am not a mechanic or engineer.
Yes, it's a two cycle four stroke engine. It IS inconsistent with current
technology, because it is new technology. We have a working model but not a
prototype yet.
Actually, when I first learned about this engine, the thing that stuck me
most was the simplicity of its motion. It struck me as being very simple
geometry. Did you get a feel from the patent what its motion is like? That
was what convinced me to get involved.
Tina
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Historic gasoline prices, 1965-1978
- From: Someone
- Re: Historic gasoline prices, 1965-1978
- From: Doug Miller
- Re: Historic gasoline prices, 1965-1978
- References:
- Historic gasoline prices, 1965-1978
- From: Ann
- Re: Historic gasoline prices, 1965-1978
- From: Christina Peterson
- Re: Historic gasoline prices, 1965-1978
- From: Vic Dura
- Re: Historic gasoline prices, 1965-1978
- From: Doug Miller
- Re: Historic gasoline prices, 1965-1978
- From: Christina Peterson
- Re: Historic gasoline prices, 1965-1978
- From: Dave Hinz
- Re: Historic gasoline prices, 1965-1978
- From: Doug Miller
- Re: Historic gasoline prices, 1965-1978
- From: Elmo
- Re: Historic gasoline prices, 1965-1978
- From: Christina Peterson
- Re: Historic gasoline prices, 1965-1978
- From: Strange Indeed
- Historic gasoline prices, 1965-1978
- Prev by Date: Re: Historic gasoline prices, 1965-1978
- Next by Date: Re: Historic gasoline prices, 1965-1978
- Previous by thread: Re: Historic gasoline prices, 1965-1978
- Next by thread: Re: Historic gasoline prices, 1965-1978
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|