Re: Gee Old Fart - You're Smarter than Ten States
- From: OldSalt@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2011 04:05:51 -0800
On Fri, 28 Jan 2011 21:51:37 -0500, WaIIy <WaIIy@(nft).invalid> wrote:
On Fri, 28 Jan 2011 10:58:03 -0800, OldSalt@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
On Thu, 27 Jan 2011 19:16:55 -0500, WaIIy <WaIIy@(nft).invalid> wrote:
On Thu, 27 Jan 2011 15:44:50 -0800, OldSalt@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
On Thu, 27 Jan 2011 18:30:33 -0500, WaIIy <WaIIy@(nft).invalid> wrote:
10 states now developing eligibility-proof demands
107 Electoral College votes controlled by Arizona, Texas, Connecticut,
others
Posted: January 26, 2011
By Bob Unruh
Arizona may have the most advanced plan, but 10 of the United States ?
controlling 107 Electoral College votes ? are now considering some type
of legislation that would plug the hole in federal election procedures
that in 2008 allowed Barack Obama to be nominated, elected and
inaugurated without providing proof of his qualifications under the U.S.
Constitution.
He did provide proof, this is just Republicans doing "He isn't
like us, he's black wink, wink."
It's not "just like" anything.
Yes it is, or are you now claiming no President has prove he
was a US citerson, since they need to change the law. I hear
Washington was really born in London, England. If I am wrong show me
his birth citifict.
You're senile, that has to be it.
No just being you.
.
- References:
- Re: Gee Old Fart - You're Smarter than Ten States
- From: OldSalt
- Re: Gee Old Fart - You're Smarter than Ten States
- From: OldSalt
- Re: Gee Old Fart - You're Smarter than Ten States
- Prev by Date: Re: Palin unfavorable rating at all time high
- Next by Date: Re: Hey Buzzy; Check out Egypt
- Previous by thread: Re: Gee Old Fart - You're Smarter than Ten States
- Next by thread: Re: Gee Old Fart - You're Smarter than Ten States
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|