Re: $3.657,394,113.84
- From: chatnoir <wolfbat359a@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 9 Jan 2011 16:52:32 -0800 (PST)
On Jan 9, 2:31 pm, Buzz <buzzar...@xxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sun, 9 Jan 2011 11:19:25 -0800 (PST), chatnoir
<wolfbat3...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Jan 9, 11:03 am, Buzz <buzzar...@xxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sun, 9 Jan 2011 08:54:52 -0800 (PST), chatnoir
<wolfbat3...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Jan 9, 8:16 am, cg <cgrams7@{removethis}yahoo.com> wrote:
On Sun, 09 Jan 2011 08:40:54 -0600, OuroborosRex <i...@xxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
On 1/9/11 8:04 AM, Buzz wrote:
On Sun, 9 Jan 2011 05:18:36 -0800 (PST), chatnoir
<wolfbat3...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Jan 9, 3:48 am, Buzz<buzzar...@xxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sat, 8 Jan 2011 04:02:22 -0800 (PST), chatnoir
<wolfbat3...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Jan 7, 3:49 pm, Buzz<buzzar...@xxxxxxx> wrote:
$3.657,394,113.84
That's the amount of debt racked up while pelosi was speaker.... PER
DAY!
More was racked up in her 1461 days as speaker than was amassed by the
first 49 speakers.
So, when the Republicans talk about cutting $100 billion, thats
roughly only 27 days worth of deficit spending during pelosi's reign.
http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/final-tab-pelosi-s-speakership-53...
Yet, the howling is coming. The sad sack stories are coming. Everyone
with 1/2 a brain cell had to know that the left's spending coundn't
continue, yet there will be story after story of this family who can't
afford this, an elderly person who can't afford that, a child who
doesn't have the other.
And at the same time, the Republicans, controlling only 1/2 of
Congress, will be criticized for not reigning in the left's deficit.
Liberalism is a mental disorder.
Sounds like most was during Bush reign!
Bush wasn't Speaker.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
Bush acepted the Bills! What budgets did he request?
Who approves the budgets?
Republican congress, during Bush's 6 years without a single spending
veto. AND his no downpayment money law for house flippers since 2004.
So, how much of this spending was on Bush commitments (see Medicare
part D, no-bid pharma) and Gramm's economic meltdown?
Show us.
When is it going to sink in that the federal government is broken?
As long as you refuse to tax the rich, the Governemtn will remain
broken!
What percentage of Federal Income Taxes do the top 1% of earners pay?
...the top 5?
...the top 10?
What percentage of Federal Income Taxes do the bottom 40% pay?
Are you seeing how incredibly mindless it is to keep chanting the
idiot line **tax the rich**? - Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
The question is what do the top 1%, and 5% earn and possess as part of
the total national income! What do they benefit under the system!
That was my next question.
Did you bother to look it up or would you rather not see in black in
white that the rich are already paying amounts disproportionate to the
incomes they earn.
But not to the income and wealth they make and possess!
It's out there. Look it up. Then, if you have a modicum of self
respect more than Dave K, you'll stop parroting the ridiculous line.
Kick the Dave Ks out of the wagon, get them to start helping instead
of whining, and you can do more good than focusing on a tiny fraction
of the nation.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: $3.657,394,113.84
- From: Buzz
- Re: $3.657,394,113.84
- References:
- Re: $3.657,394,113.84
- From: Buzz
- Re: $3.657,394,113.84
- From: chatnoir
- Re: $3.657,394,113.84
- From: Buzz
- Re: $3.657,394,113.84
- From: OuroborosRex
- Re: $3.657,394,113.84
- From: chatnoir
- Re: $3.657,394,113.84
- From: Buzz
- Re: $3.657,394,113.84
- From: chatnoir
- Re: $3.657,394,113.84
- From: Buzz
- Re: $3.657,394,113.84
- Prev by Date: Re: 'THERE IS A NEED FOR SOME REFLECTION HERE'.... As the political world continues to monitor developments in Tucson, there have been some interesting responses from the right, beyond the condolences and well wishes.
- Next by Date: Re: $3.657,394,113.84
- Previous by thread: Re: $3.657,394,113.84
- Next by thread: Re: $3.657,394,113.84
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|