Obama smacked down on privacy

http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2010/12/cell-site-warrants/

Court Rebuffs Obama on Warrantless Cell-Site Tracking


"A federal appeals court on Wednesday rejected the Obama administration’s contention that the government is never required to get a court warrant to obtain cell-site information that mobile-phone carriers retain on their customers.

The decision by the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals is one in a string of court decisions boosting Americans’ privacy (.pdf) in the digital age — rulings the government fought against. The most significant and recent decision came Tuesday, when a different federal appeals court said for the first time the government must obtain a court warrant for an internet service provider to grant the authorities access to a suspect’s e-mail.

The case that concluded Wednesday concerns historical cell-site location information, which carriers usually retain for about 18 months. The data identifies the cell tower the customer was connected to at the beginning of a call and at the end of the call — and is often used in criminal prosecutions and investigations.

“Prosecutors across the country use the statute in criminal investigations to obtain a wide range of evidence,” (.pdf) the administration told the Philadelphia-based 3rd Circuit.

The Stored Communications Act, the appeals court ruled in September, granted judges the discretion to require a warrant under the Fourth Amendment for the government to obtain the cell-site information. It was the first appellate court to reach that conclusion, despite a handful of lower-court decisions freeing the government from that requirement.

The Obama administration urged the appellate court to reconsider its position, an offer the court declined Wednesday without commenting on the merits.

The administration has also asked the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit to reverse its August ruling requiring court warrants to affix GPS devices to vehicles to track their every move. The administration said Americans should expect no privacy “in the totality of his or her movements in public places.” ...
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Dumb Bob, liberal crybabies and the Constitution
    ... Even the Supreme Court ruling last week on the rights of Gitmo ... That doesn't make actions of the US government or decisions by its ... Bush claims the right to spy on everything -- including attorney-client ... Constitution, the secret eavesdropping that undercuts our legal system will ...
    (misc.survivalism)
  • 2012 Human Rights Reports: Poland
    ... Among the country’s principal human rights problems were an inefficient judicial system and lengthy court procedures, which impeded the delivery of justice. ... According to the latest available data, government monitoring of telephone locations and call logs without judicial review increased and remained unregulated. ... Other human rights problems included abuse of prisoners by guards and delayed restitution of private property. ... The criminal code lacks a clear, legal definition of torture, which authorities did not report as a separate crime. ...
    (soc.culture.polish)
  • Re: outsourcing again
    ... Calling the process of rendition "outsourcing," a federal appeals court ... Canadian government this year after it was determined that American ... Mr. Arar's lawyers told the court that his lawsuit should be reinstated ... The appeals court has yet to rule on Mr. Arar's appeal. ...
    (soc.retirement)
  • Re: Understanding Political Science
    ... New Constitution the word "Supreme" Court. ... lobbyists who are blackmailing having things be done, by government, ... this country—when there is no proof that those justices are ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Understanding Political Science
    ... New Constitution the word "Supreme" Court. ... lobbyists who are blackmailing having things be done, by government, ... this country—when there is no proof that those justices are ...
    (sci.physics)