Re: Fox - "Our news hours are subjective." ...Yeah.
- From: Buzz <buzzard99@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2009 15:13:34 -0400
On Fri, 23 Oct 2009 11:11:42 -0500, "Ouroboros Rex" <its@xxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Buzz wrote:
On Thu, 22 Oct 2009 10:28:25 -0500, "Ouroboros Rex" <its@xxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Buzz wrote:
On Wed, 21 Oct 2009 20:08:40 -0400, Dave K <dave.k@xxxxxxx> wrote:
On Wed, 21 Oct 2009 19:39:37 -0400, Buzz <buzzard99@xxxxxxx> wrote:
On Wed, 21 Oct 2009 19:05:03 -0400, Dave K <dave.k@xxxxxxx> wrote:
On Wed, 21 Oct 2009 18:50:48 -0400, Buzz <buzzard99@xxxxxxx>
wrote:
Dolt, it's OBJECTIVE, not SUBJECTIVE.In your opinion, is FOX Objective?
If you're going to quote uber left wing lie sites, at least let
someone else come and type out the quotes for you.
Yes, their news segments are objective. From what I've seen, more
so than other cable news networks.
Interesting.
For example, Shepherd (sp?) Smith might report that the dems are
proposing to move $250 b b Billion of the costs of obamacare to a
seperate bill so that they can make the claim that they're not
adding one dime to the deficit.
O-Reily or Hannity may talk about what weasels they are for doing it
and what dolts their supporters are for buying it.
The first is the news. The second is commentary (after all, it's
certainly not news that people are falling for it)
"Americans are so enamored of equality that they would rather be
equal in slavery than unequal in freedom." - Alexis de Tocqueville
Actually, Terri, if the first part had been news, it would state
that the items in the separate bill were not originally parts of
Obamacare, instead of lying that it's a bait-and-switch. lol
http://www.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/10/20/health.care/index.html
"...Under the bill proposed by Sen. Debbie Stabenow, D-Michigan,
Congress would override a formula it set more than a decade ago that
was intended to prevent Medicare costs from rising faster than
planned. The formula calls for cutting projected Medicare
reimbursements to doctors, and Stabenow's bill would reverse those
cuts, just as Congress has done repeatedly since the formula was
imposed in 1997."
..."Without congressional action, Rohack said, physicians could face
a cumulative 40 percent reduction in Medicare payments over the next
six years -- a huge problem as baby boomers become old enough to
qualify for Medicare. Doctors are currently slated to be hit with a
21 percent reimbursement cut early next year."
Here's another view of the "news". Obviously, someone's not got
something right, huh?
http://www.usnews.com/blogs/peter-roff/2009/10/21/democrats-dishonest-doc-fix-dodges-deficit.html
So which do you believe?
You mean, between a news article and a partisan editorial? lol
No, between CNN and an informed editorial.
.
http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Peter_Roff
http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Institute_For_Liberty
http://www.conservatives4palin.com/2009/02/peter-roff-palin-conservative-in-reagan.html#
Take a wild guess.
You do understand Congress has been doing this repeatedly since 1997,
right? So, explain to us why it should even BE in the health care bill
instead of separate.
- References:
- Fox - "Our news hours are subjective." ...Yeah.
- From: Ouroboros Rex
- Re: Fox - "Our news hours are subjective." ...Yeah.
- From: Buzz
- Re: Fox - "Our news hours are subjective." ...Yeah.
- From: Buzz
- Re: Fox - "Our news hours are subjective." ...Yeah.
- From: Dave K
- Re: Fox - "Our news hours are subjective." ...Yeah.
- From: Buzz
- Re: Fox - "Our news hours are subjective." ...Yeah.
- From: Ouroboros Rex
- Re: Fox - "Our news hours are subjective." ...Yeah.
- From: Buzz
- Re: Fox - "Our news hours are subjective." ...Yeah.
- From: Ouroboros Rex
- Fox - "Our news hours are subjective." ...Yeah.
- Prev by Date: Re: 7 Months later...
- Next by Date: Re: Poll Nobama
- Previous by thread: Re: Fox - "Our news hours are subjective." ...Yeah.
- Next by thread: Re: Fox - "Our news hours are subjective." ...Yeah.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|