Re: The Fair Tax

On Fri, 12 Jun 2009 15:57:27 -0500, "Ouroboros Rex" <its@xxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

Buzz wrote:
On Thu, 11 Jun 2009 17:18:08 -0400, Dave K <dave.k@xxxxxxx> wrote:

On Thu, 11 Jun 2009 17:04:55 -0400, Buzz <buzzard99@xxxxxxx> wrote:

<snip>

IT'S REVENUE NEUTRAL! Can you not understand that?

It is not understanding, it is belief. It is a faith thing. just
because you say it is so does not convince me.

I take it you've not read the book or otherwise taken any steps to
gain an understanding of it either?


It is regressive, and the lowest income earners will pay a greater
portion of their income than those who do not have to spend. Yes I
know there is an answer for it, but I don't believe it. It is all
about faith.

And how is it that some people "do not have to spend"? Tha't'a an
interesting concept. Perhaps you should share it with the less
fortunate?

You know there's an answer but you don't believe it before you even
know it? Wow.


Sorry! Not really, but you get the idea.

I'll talk about it all you want, but you will have to get over
yourself and your inability to comprehend something that doesn't
specifically have a "Corporate Tax" component to it.

A true conservative response; it is not your presentation, it is
their failure to understand it.<g>

How difficult is the concept of revenue neutral to understand?


Besides, this is a Neil Boortz thing. I'd not trust him with my
garbage.

Ohhhh... now I see. Just like Rex can't or won't allow his brain to
look at the FairTax unless it addresses the made up concept of the
**corporate infrastructure tax**, you will remain ignorant on the
topic because of one of the authors?

Amazing... well, actually, not.

Are you claiming that part of corporate taxes does not go toward
infrastructure?


Oh gheesch.

I'm claiming that the FairTax is revenue neutral. If the government
spends X dollars on infrastructure now, they'll be free to spend X
dollars on infrastructure after the FairTax is enacted.
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: The Fair Tax
    ... It is not understanding, it is belief. ... It is a faith thing. ... I'm claiming that the FairTax is revenue neutral. ... Utterly irrelevant. ...
    (misc.news.internet.discuss)
  • Re: The Fair Tax
    ... It is not understanding, it is belief. ... It is all about faith. ... the FairTax taxes everyone at the same rate on what ... Spend more, pay more. ...
    (misc.news.internet.discuss)
  • Re: Cranks on the endangered species list
    ... modern physics mistake understanding and agreement with "unquestioning ... "Sufficiently advanced understanding is indistinguishable from faith." ... unrelated to science (and thus uninteresting to most scientists). ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Cranks on the endangered species list
    ... modern physics mistake understanding and agreement with "unquestioning ... matter of "unquestioning faith". ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Cranks on the endangered species list
    ... The problem around here is that all too many people unfamiliar with modern physics mistake understanding and agreement with "unquestioning faith". ... The cranks and crackpots around here are in a completely different world, which is unrelated to science (and thus uninteresting to most scientists). ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)