Re: Isn't Another 'Suspension' Necessary?
- From: "mr.smartypants" <georgewkspam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2008 06:00:28 -0700
In article <9604e4p20fn98sp949h4lsnjbag9daei8b@xxxxxxx>,
trudogg <independent@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
This will probably come across as a little snarky because, well, it
is. But I have to ask: isn't it incumbent on John McCain to at least
pretend to "suspend" his campaign again?
I was just looking back at what McCain said on Thursday, when he
insisted that the crisis on Wall Street was so serious, he had no
choice but to drop everything, return to Washington, and help play a
role in striking a deal.
"I cannot carry on a campaign as though this dangerous situation
had not occurred, or as though a solution were at hand, which it
clearly is not.... With so much on the line, for America and the
world, the debate that matters most right now is taking place in the
United States Capitol -- and I intend to join it.
"It has become clear that no consensus has developed to support
the Administration's proposal to meet the crisis. I do not believe
that the plan on the table will pass as it currently stands, and we
are running out of time. So I am returning to Washington...."
As we now know, McCain really didn't "suspend" anything, and he didn't
play a constructive role in the process. But putting that aside, if
McCain keeps campaigning now, as he seems poised to do, wouldn't he
necessarily be carrying on "as though this dangerous situation had not
occurred"?
In other words, McCain set a standard for himself -- in the midst of a
crisis, with little hope of a solution, and with time running out,
heading to the campaign trail is not only a mistake, it's selfish.
Indeed, it's failing to put "country first." That's the standard he
created, and publicly articulated just a few days ago. Now, not so
much.
As Noam Scheiber explained:
http://tinyurl.com/4w4pqe
So the bailout deal collapses and McCain is headed to ... Iowa?
I'm confused. I assumed the "country-first" move would be to
suspend his campaign all over again and hunker down in Washington till
we worked things out.
It wouldn't even be that hard. McCain can find more than half the
votes we need among his home-state colleagues in the House, all of
whom voted against the deal.
The bottom line is straightforward enough: McCain "left" the campaign
trail on Thursday because of the crisis. As of this afternoon, the
crisis is much, much worse.
So, what does McCain plan to do now? Phone it in?
?Steve Benen
I post here and there,, How I've come to question McCain's judgment.
--
Money; What a concept !
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Isn't Another 'Suspension' Necessary?
- From: trudogg
- Re: Isn't Another 'Suspension' Necessary?
- References:
- Isn't Another 'Suspension' Necessary?
- From: trudogg
- Isn't Another 'Suspension' Necessary?
- Prev by Date: Iran Wins Iraq War!
- Next by Date: Re: Conservative, pro-war, pro-Bush paper dies
- Previous by thread: Isn't Another 'Suspension' Necessary?
- Next by thread: Re: Isn't Another 'Suspension' Necessary?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|