Re: Billary on the road to the WH.
- From: "Ouroboros_Rex" <its@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2007 16:04:23 -0600
"cg" <cgrams7@{removethis}yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:tobbl3tuq69kpg0j30n46tdeeg3acqme9g@xxxxxxxxxx
On Sat, 01 Dec 2007 18:42:48 GMT, cg <cgrams7@{removethis}yahoo.com>
wrote:
On Sat, 01 Dec 2007 18:11:15 GMT, Putt <arachnid01@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Don't count on it...
Obama still has the potential to keep her out...
It is starting to look like her husband is the more likely candidate
when it comes to someone keeping her from being elected.
No sooner had I wondered where he was on the campaign trail than he
starts showing up taking the spotlight. If he continues down that
trail it will pretty much guarantee the negative polling figures for
Sen. Clinton remain high. Nothing like a little reminder to reinforce
a person's rejection of President Billary. Who wants that?
Whomever that might be, they are certainly in the minority.
So, please, keep up the good work and make certain that "I didn't have
sexual relations" finger point continues to make the news. Nothing
like a little graphic reminder either.
But be careful Mr. Clinton. I hear your wife is not pleased.
========================================================
Hillary ready to 'kill Bill' over issue of honesty
Tuesday, December 04, 2007
By Leonard Doyle in Washington
Not for the first time, Hillary Clinton is reported to be incandescent
with her husband for inadvertently reminding Americans how hard it can
be to get the straight, unvarnished truth from the Clintons.
Excerpted from;
http://www.belfasttelegraph.co.uk/news/world-news/article3221155.ece
========================================================
Despite a bunch of Torygraph noise about lies, they don't seem to be able
to prove Bill's statement false either. So far, all I've seen is a
statement from him that "I supported the president when he asked for
authority to stand up against weapons of mass destruction in Iraq.", which,
as republicans were hasty to tell us at the time, does not equal a war.
"He's finally destroying his missiles, so let's give him a certain date in
which, in this time, he has to destroy the missiles, reconcile the
discrepancies in what we believe is the truth on chemical weapons, reconcile
the discrepancies on biological weapons, reconcile the issue of the Drones,
and offer up 150 scientists who can travel outside of Iraq with their
families for interviews. If you do that, then we'll say this is really
good-faith disarmament, and we'll go on without a conflict. Now if that
passes, however, then you have to be willing to take yes for an answer. You
see what I mean? I'm for regime change too, but there's more than one way to
do it. We don't invade everybody whose regime we want to change. There's
more than one way to do this, but if that passes and he actually disarms,
then we have to be willing to take it, and then work for regime change by
supporting the opposition to Saddam Hussein within and outside Iraq, and
doing other things." -- Bill Clinton, March 14, 2003
.
- References:
- Billary on the road to the WH.
- From: A Veteran
- Re: Billary on the road to the WH.
- From: Putt
- Billary on the road to the WH.
- Prev by Date: Re: The Wood Spider--needs sound
- Next by Date: Re: Iranian Nuclear Weapons Program Stopped in 2003
- Previous by thread: Re: Billary on the road to the WH.
- Next by thread: Best Buy revisited, my how things change
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
