Bye bye to Cleveland GOP Election Chair



[..."Ballots for Bush" Bennett. Whatta concept...]


by Bob Fitrakis & Harvey Wasserman

Ohio's Bob "Ballots for Bush" Bennett, an essential player in putting
George W. Bush back in the White House in 2004, is no long chair of
the Cuyahoga County Board of Elections. His milestone resignation
leaves a legacy of scandal, recrimination, massive voter purges,
felony convictions and a pivotal role in a stolen presidential
election.

Bennett has quit in a signature cloud of graceless accusations and
cheap shots at Jennifer Brunner, Ohio's newly elected Secretary of
State, who asked him to resign along with the rest of the Cleveland
election authority. His forced departure marks the biggest landmark
yet in the unraveling theft of the presidential elections in Ohio
2004.

Bennett remains chair of the Ohio Republican Party. In 2004 he was
apparently asked by White House consigliere Karl Rove to stay on at
the Cuyahoga BOE to help guarantee Bush's second term. Cleveland is
Ohio's biggest and most Democratic urban center. A massive sweep there
by John Kerry was widely expected to have given him the White House.
It was Bennett's job to mute that margin, and apparently that's
exactly what he did.

Leading up to the 2004 vote, Bennett oversaw the quiet purge of some
168,000 registered voters from the Cuyahoga rolls, including 24.93% of
the entire city of Cleveland, which voted 83% for Kerry. In one inner
city majority African American ward, 51% of the voters were purged.
Centered on precincts that voted more than 80% for John Kerry, this
purge may well have meant a net loss to the Democrats of tens of
thousands of votes in an election that was officially decided
statewide by less than 119,000.

In a report issued December 7, 2004, the Greater Cleveland Voter
Registration Coalition (GCVRC) reported that in addition to the purge
of registered voters, some 3.5% of those applying for new
registrations were never even entered on the rolls by Bennett's BOE,
or were entered incorrectly, which would result in disenfranchisement
of those who had just tried to become new voters. Additionally, the
GCVRC estimated that "over 10,000 voters in Cuyahoga County would be
compromised because of these clerical errors."

Bennett refused to respond to the report's initial conclusions. When
the study became public, BOE Executive Director Michael Vu accused the
study coordinator of "inciting panic." Vu did not respond to GCVRC's
request for the reinstatement of 303 voter registrations where there
was direct evidence that they had been wrongly cancelled.

The GCVRC also documented that the Cuyahoga County BOE incorrectly
classified 463 properly registered voters as not registered. This
included 201 voters who were registered on BOE computers on August 17,
but for some unexplained reason, were removed from the rolls by
October 22. They then were forced to vote provisionally and their
votes were rejected as not registered.

In Brunner's formal complaint against Bennett she cited the fact that
Bennett's BOE did nothing when an estimated 10,000 voters were thrown
off the voting roll by a Diebold voter registration computer glitch.

Also, Bennett's BOE rejected 262 properly registered voters included
on its own list as of October 22. They incorrectly listed 183 as not
registered and 79 as no signatures. "The Board did not contest our
data," said the GCVRC, "but said again it was just a small percentage
due to human error, and then proceeded to certify the entire Cuyahoga
County vote even though they thereby knowingly possibly
disenfranchised 463 individuals."

Parallel purges were conducted by Republican-controlled boards of
election in Hamilton County (Cincinnati) where some 105,000 voters
were purged from the rolls, and in Lucas County (Toledo), where some
28,000 were purged in an unprecedented move in late August 2004. These
remain the only three counties in the state known to have conducted
massive registration purges prior to the 2004 election. The three mass
urban purges decimated the rolls in heavily Democratic areas. Since
then, another 170,000 voters have been purged from the rolls in
Franklin County, primarily in the heavily Democratic Columbus
precincts. Many rural Republican counties, like Miami, practice a
"no-purge" policy.

From his post at the helm of both the Ohio GOP and the Cuyahoga BOE,
Bennett was at the center of the purges. Many of the 300,000-plus
purged voters reported that they never received notice that their
voting rights had been cancelled. Should the general 80%
pro-Democratic inner city margins have prevailed for all three purged
lists, the net loss to the Kerry camp could have been in the range of
100,000 votes.

In addition to the purges, Bennett was also at the center of the
election challenges to college students in Democratic enclaves.

Bennett is infamous for far more than massive voter purges. Under his
supervision, a legally mandated recount of the 2004 presidential vote
was illegally manipulated. Ohio law says precincts must be chosen at
random for hand counting as part of the recount process. But two
Cuyahoga BOE employees have been convicted of a felony and a
misdemeanor each, and have each been sentenced to eighteen months in
prison for what prosecutors have called "rigging" the recount.

Bennett was also instrumental in the purchase of some $20 million in
Diebold voting machines for 2006 statewide elections. Election
protection activists vehemently opposed the purchase, as seen in a
nationally televised HBO special, "Hacking Democracy." Under Bennett
and Cuyahoga BOE Executive Director Michael Vu, the machines
malfunctioned in Ohio's 2006 primary, with vote count reporting
delayed for five days.

Long-time election activist Adele Eisner characterizes Bennett's reign
at the Cuyahoga BOE as a "culture with fear." Among other things,
Bennett chose to disregard long-standing laws requiring that election
results be posted at the precinct level, a decision backed by Ohio's
former Secretary of State J. Kenneth Blackwell.

In a recent audit of the general 2006 elections, Dr. Richard Hayes
Phillips found that in the initial vote count, "Cuyahoga County alone
accounted for 148,928 undervotes, or 42.47% of the statewide total."
The undervotes occurred in the race for U.S. Senate, where voters
apparently opted to not vote for either incumbent Sen. Mike DeWine or
Democrat Sherrod Brown, the eventual winner. The undervotes
represented 26.48% of the county's voters.

But, says Philips, "Once the official results were posted, Cuyahoga's
undervote total fell to 3.25%," leaving him to wonder "how the
unofficial results could have been so erroneous in the first place."

Hayes also found that Cuyahoga County reported 30,791 uncounted
absentee and provisional ballots. After these ballots were counted,
they reported 39,262 votes, an outcome Phillips terms mathematically
"impossible."

Bennett and Vu were also responsible for more than $12,900,000 in BOE
cost overruns, more than doubling the agency's original budget of
$11,000,000.

Vu resigned earlier this year, and has since been hired as an
Assistant Registrar of Voters in San Diego County, the number two
spot, with a $10,000 salary increase to $130,000 a year. The San Diego
Union-Tribune noted that, "Vu's resignation followed a tumultuous 3
1/2-year tenure as election chief, including a disastrous May 2006
primary when the county began using new electronic voting machines."

In response to the chaos and recrimination, Brunner requested the
resignations of the Cuyahoga board's two Democrats and two
Republicans. Only Bennett vowed to fight his removal.

But he has now become the highest election board official to resign
here amidst the deepening scandals surrounding the 2004 election. He
has joined the growing Republican chorus echoing Rove's line that the
Democrats are preparing to steal the 2008 election.

But Brunner has taken custody of the 2004 ballots and other vote count
materials, which are currently protected by a federal court decision.
She is expected to bring them from Ohio's 88 county boards to a
central repository in Columbus.

Meanwhile, new evidence is emerging that Karl Rove and the GOP had
real-time computer access to both the actual vote numbers in Ohio as
well as the exit polling data that would have allowed them to direct
how many votes they needed from the suspect Ohio southwestern
Republican counties that gave Bush his official margin of victory in
the 2004 election. Stay tuned.
.



Relevant Pages

  • OT- Rolling Stone: Was the 2004 Election Stolen?
    ... I spent the evening of the 2004 election watching the ... Republican National Committee to register voters in six battleground ... mysteriously failed to properly register a presidential vote on more than ... as many as 1 million ballots were ...
    (alt.sports.basketball.nba.la-lakers)
  • Eleven worst places in the country to vote -- all controlled by Republicons
    ... We used to think the voting system was something like the traffic laws -- a ... Some allow prisoners to vote; ... Georgia state legislators passed a bill requiring voters to present ... director of election law at Ohio State University's Moritz College of Law. ...
    (alt.politics)
  • Re: Democrat Dirty Tricks: A Primer on Stealing Elections
    ... 2004 United States election voting controversies ... During the 2004 United States presidential election, ... voters were registered, whether voters were registered multiple times, ... Democrats accuse the Republicans of using this as an excuse for vote ...
    (misc.survivalism)
  • Will Dress Code Affect Your Right To Vote?
    ... In Pennsylvania, two Pittsburgh-area elections officials are suing to permit a dress code at polling places, after a Pennsylvania Department of State memo advised counties last month that voters' attire doesn't matter. ... And in Ohio, a legal skirmish over same-day registration and voting has not prevented hundreds from casting absentee ballots a month before Election Day, even though they do not plan on bring out of state come November 4. ... Across the country, voter registration leading up to a highly-anticipated presidential election has been up, but so are concerns that bureaucracy, misreadings of election law, or just plain stupid mistakes may cost many Americans their right to exercise their vote. ... In their lawsuit, two election officials warn that, if the memo stands, "nothing would prevent a partisan group from synchronizing a battalion of like-minded individuals ... ...
    (soc.retirement)
  • Read about the stolen 2000 and 2004 presidential contests
    ... Vote Counts ... 2008 Primaries, Disenfranchized Voters, Stolen Election, ... signs warning that fraudulent voting is a felony. ...
    (alt.politics.bush)