Re: Dem bottom feeders

Old Salt <old777salt@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in
news:0578t2tmme0lhiuatuttlgl3qkqp77rrqh@xxxxxxx:

On Thu, 15 Feb 2007 04:10:29 GMT the fame writer, Putt wrote not much
to be useful on, "Re: Dem bottom feeders",

Ok, here is a bottom post..

YOU said she was full of shit....
You should be able to take any of the instances that she
provided and refute them... Or are you afraid that you just
might find out what she posted is the truth???
YOU, not me, said they were lies... The onus is on you, not me...

Putt...

You still don't get it do you. I will try to speak real slow
for you. One can NOT prove a negative, only a positive. If someone
here said there is a real Santa Claws, I could NOT prove there wasn't,
only the person claiming it, or some other who belive it, could prove
there was, if there was. Which there isn't.

If you can't prove the positive, then it's false. You claim
what she is saying is true, then you have to prove it's true, if you
can't then it's false. Once can NOT prove something is false only if
it true.

These are the laws of logic, as any freshmen in collage would
know.

I give up....
You have no logic whatsoever...
Lemme make this so simple that even you can understand it..
I say: "when you throw a rock into the sky, it stays there"
You reply: "No, it falls to the ground"
I then reply, : "Prove it"
You then cite articles, pictures, even throw a rock into the air and
film it falling back to earth..
Same thing here Salt.. Coulter made statements to the dates/sequence
of events of the article in question...
You said, in effect, B.S.... all you have to do,
now pay attention, is refute any of the statements she made
with factual data.. See how easy it is???

Putt...


--
E-mail is munged, remove one of the hot's...
.