Re: South Dakota scandal??
- From: Putt <arachnid01@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 03 Feb 2007 06:01:46 GMT
Sorry Fred,
Wont wash.... where is the moral outrage from the Left on this one???
Wanna bet he won't resign???
Putt...
FredEx <fredex@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
news:o428s2dd7l1oaop1hvk8pgnffvpn3ddrc6@xxxxxxx:
On Fri, 02 Feb 2007 18:51:30 GMT, Putt <arachnid01@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:the
Where is the moral outrage from the Left??
Or are you just a bunch of hippocrites??
Where is your defense of it since the page was well above the age on
consent, 18? Seems I read your boy Foley being defended here because
one page in his case was 15 -16 and was above the age of consent inmost
states. Funny how the view twists now.event
I don't think it was right when Foley did it and even though this
was with an older male and supposedly was the one time, I don't thinkit
is right either.Foley
Big difference here is nobody is trying to cover this up like the
case and nobody is ignoring it. The allegation has been made and the
investigation has begun.
--
E-mail is munged, remove one of the hot's...
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: South Dakota scandal??
- From: tomaldrich@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: South Dakota scandal??
- References:
- South Dakota scandal??
- From: Putt
- South Dakota scandal??
- Prev by Date: attn: teddy - really astonishing mp3 music - sutza rumko - (1/1)
- Next by Date: Re: The Death of Glaciers
- Previous by thread: Re: South Dakota scandal??
- Next by thread: Re: South Dakota scandal??
- Index(es):