Re: What more proof ?
- From: "Amused" <Amused@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2006 09:41:24 -0500
"Just Judy" <Just_Joody@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1jr142dasam7p3kegcs4hkqdcth73ekndc@xxxxxxxxxx
On Fri, 14 Apr 2006 14:50:24 -0700, Old Salt <old777salt@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
On Fri, 14 Apr 2006 09:22:17 -0400 the fame writer, Just Judy wrote
not much to be useful on, "Re: What more proof ?",
On Thu, 13 Apr 2006 22:38:30 -0700, Old Salt <old777salt@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
On Thu, 13 Apr 2006 20:36:49 GMT the fame writer,
tomaldrich@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote not much to be useful on, "What more
proof ?",
Another retired General has voiced opinion vs. Rumsfield
Not it's up to 5 high ranking Gens who are coming out with the
truth.
That many? Wow, they must be right.
Considering how high there rank is, and what jobs they held
before retireing, I would say so.
How many retired generals do you think are out there? More
than five? More than 200? Quoting five retirees doesn't prove
anything except they have an opinion, and you know what they say about
them.
--
I don't know how many retired generals there are, but if it's any help, in
1998 there were 877 generals and admirals on active duty. This does not
count any National Guard or Coast Guard personnel.
Right now, with Iraq, there's probably over 900 to 950 on active duty.
Just as a guesstimate, I'd think that 1500 to 2000 retired generals and
admirals, wouldn't be unreasonable.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: What more proof ?
- From: tomaldrich@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: What more proof ?
- References:
- What more proof ?
- From: tomaldrich@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- What more proof ?
- Prev by Date: Moral Majority rules in El Salvador and India!
- Next by Date: Re: Taking Bets on Rummy's Survival?
- Previous by thread: Re: What more proof ?
- Next by thread: Re: What more proof ?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
