Re: Less Regulation for Verizon
- From: "Barbara Lake" <bglake@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2006 10:39:39 -0700
"Just Judy" <Just_Joody@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:aijs32d5gc507k9o6g5mjeb5l32494o08o@xxxxxxxxxx
On Wed, 12 Apr 2006 21:27:10 -0700, "Barbara Lake" <bglake@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
e I need a
cell phone, I figured I don't need to pay $40/mo for the privilege. With
a
go phone (Cingular), I pay in $25 every three months. If I pay before the
three-month period expires, all of my minutes roll over. Right now I have
about 400 minutes.
Hmmm, that sounds effective. Cingular doesn't service my area,
but perhaps Sprint has a similar offer. My cellphone is with Sprint
... $35 for <300 minutes; weekends & nights free. So far, only once
have I gone over the 300 minutes, so my bill was $40.
Sprint's most basic landline service here costs $27, so it's
only $7 cheaper than cellular.
I'm not much for "chatting" on the phone. I'd rather chat
here. ;)
I'm not much for phone "chatting" either. I'd much rather go visit someone
than talk on the phone with them.
Barbara
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Less Regulation for Verizon
- From: Mystified One
- Re: Less Regulation for Verizon
- References:
- Less Regulation for Verizon
- From: Dave K
- Re: Less Regulation for Verizon
- From: Rick
- Re: Less Regulation for Verizon
- From: Barbara Lake
- Less Regulation for Verizon
- Prev by Date: Re: 911 After the theory, some facts
- Next by Date: Re: Teddy, you were wrong in 1965 & you're wrong again now.
- Previous by thread: Re: Less Regulation for Verizon
- Next by thread: Re: Less Regulation for Verizon
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|