Re: 911 After the theory, some facts
- From: firstname@xxxxxxxxxxxx (Florian)
- Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2006 19:16:37 +0200
nick c <n-chen@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Looking at the test photos, I don't see
anything near a test being conducted in a manner duplicating actual
conditions of the incident.
Sure, you know better than those people at the NIST. There was no blast
furnace whatsoever and the kerosene burned in about 5 minutes.
--
Florian
"Tout est au mieux dans le meilleur des mondes possible"
Voltaire vs Leibniz
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: 911 After the theory, some facts
- From: Amused
- Re: 911 After the theory, some facts
- From: nick c
- Re: 911 After the theory, some facts
- References:
- 911 After the theory, some facts
- From: Florian
- Re: 911 After the theory, some facts
- From: Florian
- Re: 911 After the theory, some facts
- From: Florian
- Re: 911 After the theory, some facts
- From: nick c
- Re: 911 After the theory, some facts
- From: Florian
- Re: 911 After the theory, some facts
- From: nick c
- Re: 911 After the theory, some facts
- From: Florian
- Re: 911 After the theory, some facts
- From: nick c
- 911 After the theory, some facts
- Prev by Date: Re: Hey GM Worker, Need A Manufacturing Job? Try Boeing.
- Next by Date: Re: 911 After the theory, some facts
- Previous by thread: Re: 911 After the theory, some facts
- Next by thread: Re: 911 After the theory, some facts
- Index(es):