Re: Most scientists say 'alternative' to evolution isn't a theory at all
- From: "Hooda Gest" <Be@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2005 16:33:46 -0400
<tomaldrich@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:43399e79$0$12174$9a6e19ea@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> On 27-Sep-2005, "Hooda Gest" <Be@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > You know, if these people really believed in evolution, they wouldn't be
> > in
> > favor of protected endangered species.
>
> Ok, what is trhe thought process behind this statement ?
Darwin's theory. Think about it... it is survival of the fittest.
Interfering with that is basically tinkering with evolution, with Mother
Nature if you will, or "playing God". That we displace species in the
process of improving our environment is only natural.
And my statement should have read "protecting endangered species"..
--
Hooda Gest
"Respect is difficult to win, easy to lose."
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: I demand an apology from mnid Bush bashers for ...
- Next by Date: Re: Most scientists say 'alternative' to evolution isn't a theory at all
- Previous by thread: Re: Most scientists say 'alternative' to evolution isn't a theory at all
- Next by thread: Re: Most scientists say 'alternative' to evolution isn't a theory at all
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|